Recent Images In This Thread
- brandCartiertagged by Murlsquirl, 2/28/15
- itemIWC Portuguese Automatic Steel Blue Mens Watch IW500107tagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryJewelry Watchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
- brandLeatherfoottagged by GauchoSF, 7/29/13
- itemNEVER WORN ROLEX SUBMARINER MENS WATCH 116619LBtagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- brandRolextagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryWatchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
Related Forum Threads
- The Watch Appreciation Thread - Part two (Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, Jaeger... Last post on Today at 7:22 am in Classic Menswear
- Top 5 sports watches under $1000 - a contest! Last post on 10/31/14 at 10:51am in Classic Menswear
- Men's watch at the $5K mark? Last post on 4/5/14 at 6:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Sub-$150 daily beater watch Last post on 7/18/16 at 4:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Poor man's watch thread Last post on Yesterday at 6:17 pm in Classic Menswear
The 5 Best Dress Watches Under $5,000 - as Voted by Styleforum!
Last edited: 2/2/16
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?Last edited: 2/8/16
- The 5 best Sport Watches under $1000 - as voted by Styleforum!Last edited: 2/2/16
- Allen Edmonds
- The Armoury
- Batch Mens
- Craftsman Clothing
- David Fin
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- Equus Leather
- Exquisite Trimmings
- Falcon Garments
- Freemans Sporting Club
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- H. Stockton
- Gentlemen's Footwear
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Blake
- H.N. White
- House of Kydos
- John Elliott
- Kent Wang
- Khaki's of Carmel
- Luxire Custom Clothing
- Meermin Mallorca
- MILER Menswear
- Need Supply Co.
- No Man Walks Alone
- Pierpont Leather
- Portland Dry Goods
- Proper Cloth
- Ring Jacket
- S.E.H Kelly
- Self Edge
- Spier & Mackay
- Standard & Strange
- Suspension Point
- Taylor Stitch
- Uncle Otis
- Vanda Fine Clothing
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Yellow Hook Necktie
- Your MadeInItaly
The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 2020post #30286 of 483123/25/14 at 3:00ampost #30287 of 483123/25/14 at 3:25ampost #30288 of 483123/25/14 at 6:31ampost #30289 of 483123/25/14 at 6:52amQuote:Originally Posted by Hayward
I was going to include some stock photos of Nautili with straps for this post, but my Google image search only turned up fakes. I'm serious.
To me the Nautilus strap is too wide and is essentially more of a wristband then a watch on a band. The strap overwhelms the watch, which should basically never happen. And that points to the fact that the bracelet is an integral part of the Nautilus design.
If I remember I will try to take a photo of the 1990's Patek Catalog that I have which shows the original Nautilus on a strap. IIRC, it is a YG case, black dial, with Roman numerals and lugs a bit more like on the Aquanaut rather than the sort of oval link attachment to a strap that we see on say today's 5712/R. I remember seeing this watch in person, years ago. For me the dial just didn't work...it was essentially the same dial was used on a Nautilus ref 3710 flat black (no ridges) with Roman numerals, but without the comet torque indicator.Quote:Originally Posted by NonServiam
Maybe. I find it difficult to see clearly as the existing Aquanaut bracelet is a horrible, horrible abomination. It might be possible to make a better one ...
I too would like to see the Aquanaut on a PP skin strap! I never warmed to the rubber strap on the Aquanaut (though I generally like rubber straps), but I do like both the case and the dial!
Looking forward to seeing pix of your addition when it arrives. When you said its "more than a little frivolous," I'm wondering if is a play on "Frill's Name" and that suggests its a Patek as we all know Frills favors 2 things...Kate and Patek.
I agree the bracelet on the Aquanaut is horrible. I don't think the original bracelet for the early Aquanauts was very good either, but I liked it more than the current one. I great prefer the Nautilus 5711 and 5712/A to the Aquanaut anyway so for me its sort of a moot issue.post #30290 of 483123/25/14 at 6:57amQuote:Originally Posted by Dino944
Perhaps its what you expressed in your earlier post. Yes you shared your enjoyment of wear a new watch, but with a few disguised jabs (at Rolex owners and Fidelity workers). Maybe that part was supposed to be funny, but doesn't translate so well in writing? If you simply said, "Oh, I went out last night and my friends really liked my new watch. I really love my new Speedy." I would simply say, "Congrats. Great choice of watch, enjoy it."
Instead you wrote a post, giving yourself credit because "you can do without all the attention" (that supposedly goes with owning a Rolex), after you just bragged about "Curiously impressing" people [through your choice of watch]. I don't work for Fidelity, but that little dig at people who work there was cute too....hopefully no one else here works for them.
I really like sharing in someone's excitement and fun concerning a new watch purchase. However, I don't think enjoying a watch requires some indirect insults to owners of other brands or maybe your employer's competitor.
As for brand recognition... do your really think Omega isn't a well known brand. Over the years I've seen tons of their ads in print and on billboards etc. There used to be tons of Omega billboards around Boston and Providence. You aren't wearing something from a small less well known brand like Peter Speake-Marin, Urwerk, Moser, or Nomos. Omega is a big company, and is well known at the very least for their Moonwatch and Seamaster. As for brand recognition, being a crutch, maybe yes, maybe no. If its all due to advertising, but the product is shoddy, then yes. If its brand recognition is attached to a company being a pioneer in a field, and a brand by which others are measured, then I think not. Remember, its always easy for a company to make something different, making something that's better is tough. I guess I don't hold it against a company if they are successful in their field, and recognized for making good products, which end up being purchased by lots of people...ymmv.
My apologies Dino, I certainly didn't mean to give offense.post #30291 of 483123/25/14 at 7:34ampost #30292 of 483123/25/14 at 7:35ampost #30293 of 483123/25/14 at 7:35amQuote:
It most certainly will not, but an AL&S is a truly exceptional pursuit!
I won't lie - I keep an eye on the preowned 1931 market, but I suspect I'd earmark the funds for the IWC 5002 (BP) I've wanted for so long. They seem to be available quite reasonably when they pop up here and there.Quote:Originally Posted by academe
Sometimes I think the emphasis on in house manufacture as a value in and of itself is a bit skewed. To me, the value of in house manufacture is that it implies better standards of quality control, finer finishing and a clearer justification for the higher prices charged for manufacture movements. However, for some houses, like AP, VC or Patek who have in the past or still source from quality manufactures like JLC, Piguet, etc. the subsequent degree of finishing for these ebauches can be so superlative and labour intensive that I can understand the premiums charged. Also I think many forget that the whole emphasis on "manufacture" is partly a function of the post-quartz mechanical watch renaissance (with more emphasis places on "artisanal" watch making in the mid/higher end market), combined with a practical reaction to the Swatch group restricting sales of ETA-based movements.
Agreed. "Manufacture" has become an almost over-marketed term despite its validity.Quote:Originally Posted by BostonHedonist
In my search for understanding of the popularity of Rolex I came across this gem of an article from two years ago in Forbes. I think I get it now.
Great article. I definitely ran through each stage and have settled on Stage 3. I had wanted a blue-dial Submariner since the 80s, but the general ROLEX=NE PLUS ULTRA attitude of some the owners I met turned me off the watch. I'd always chosen another option when having the chance to buy, but at some point I ceased caring about other peoples' lack of perspective (or poor comportment) and finally bought what I wanted. As a wedding present to myself.
Another article that's been out there for a while, and that sparked a lot of discussion at the time, was Timezone's Inside the COSC from 2003:
It's a interesting article that sees an unofficial statement from Rolex that C.O.S.C. Certification is strictly for marketing purposes, and has the director of the Geneva C.O.S.C. laboratory admitting that a Rolex movement is " the most consistently precise and accurate movement tested by COSC."
I have not read through the full 2000+ pages of this thread, so if the Timezone article above has been beaten to death I apologize for the redundancy.
270.2.63 for me today:post #30294 of 483123/25/14 at 7:38ampost #30295 of 483123/25/14 at 7:41amQuote:
No worries Boston. Congrats again on your Speedy, its definitely a great cornerstone for building a nice collection. My oldest chronograph will be celebrating its 20th birthday this year. Wishing you and your Speedy many happy years together.post #30296 of 483123/25/14 at 7:45ampost #30297 of 483123/25/14 at 7:51amThanks guys. It's going to need a service soon so I am preparing myself to go without for a while.
It was my grail watch for a very long time. Sadly my new grails are so very far out of reach that I pretend that they do not exist.post #30298 of 483123/25/14 at 7:53amQuote:
Re-quoted in full. In my most humble of opinions, the best Reverso. Bravo, I absolutely adore that watch.post #30299 of 483123/25/14 at 7:57ampost #30300 of 483123/25/14 at 7:57am
This thread is locked
- The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?
- › Vintage Dress shoe appreciation, tips, maintenance and advice 1 minute ago
- › The What Are You Wearing Today (WAYWT) Discussion Thread, Part II 1 minute ago
- › Skoaktiebolaget - Carmina, Bonafè, Carlos Santos, Saint Crispin's,... 2 minutes ago
- › The Apple Discussion Thread 2 minutes ago
- › Saint Laurent Paris - Official Thread. 2 minutes ago
- › Random fashion thoughts - Part II (A New Hope) 3 minutes ago
- › Need help selecting a belt 3 minutes ago
- › Shoe Damage Report & Shoe P0rn Central - Part II 4 minutes ago
- › The Official Alden Thread for 2016 - Share reviews, sizing, advice,... 6 minutes ago
- › OFFICIAL President Trump Thread 7 minutes ago
- › Alden #907 Straight Tip Bal Calfskin by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Leeds 2.0 Derby Men's Shoes Size US 10 D Walnut... by Lobster33
- › Dr. Martens Unisex Original 10 Eye Steel Toe Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Chippewa Men's Super Logger Waterproof Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Mosey Life Working Girl Travel Laptop Tote by sprout2
- › Allen Cox Brief trunks by sprout2
- › Sutor Mantellassi Men's C 567 Oxford by sprout2
- › Alden Burgundy Shell Cordovan Longwing by smfdoc
- › Alden Black Shell Cordovan Plain Toe by smfdoc
- › Florsheim Vincent Wingtip Oxford by smfdoc
- › Five Menswear Trends for Fall
- › Don’t “Just Buy a New One”,...
- › Why Pay Such A Premium For Sunspel Or James...
- › In the Details: Lucian Föhr
- › A Sunday Drive: Styleforum Spring GMTOs
- › Should I dryclean my jeans, and if not, how...
- › The 5 Most-Hyped Handbags of the Moment
- › Eight Vignettes in Search of a (Wedding) Theme
- › The Kent Wang Cufflink Giveaway
- › Where to Buy a Last-Minute Wedding Suit for...