Recent Images In This Thread
- brandCartiertagged by Murlsquirl, 2/28/15
- itemIWC Portuguese Automatic Steel Blue Mens Watch IW500107tagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryJewelry Watchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
- brandLeatherfoottagged by GauchoSF, 7/29/13
- itemNEVER WORN ROLEX SUBMARINER MENS WATCH 116619LBtagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- brandRolextagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryWatchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
Related Forum Threads
- The Watch Appreciation Thread - Part two (Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, Jaeger... Last post on Today at 12:57 pm in Classic Menswear
- Top 5 sports watches under $1000 - a contest! Last post on 10/31/14 at 10:51am in Classic Menswear
- Men's watch at the $5K mark? Last post on 4/5/14 at 6:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Sub-$150 daily beater watch Last post on 7/18/16 at 4:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Poor man's watch thread Last post on Today at 2:07 pm in Classic Menswear
The 5 Best Dress Watches Under $5,000 - as Voted by Styleforum!
Last edited: 2/2/16
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?Last edited: 2/8/16
- The 5 best Sport Watches under $1000 - as voted by Styleforum!Last edited: 2/2/16
- Allen Edmonds
- The Armoury
- Batch Mens
- Craftsman Clothing
- David Fin
- Deo Veritas
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- Equus Leather
- Exquisite Trimmings
- Falcon Garments
- Freemans Sporting Club
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- H. Stockton
- Gentlemen's Footwear
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Blake
- H.N. White
- House of Kydos
- John Elliott
- Kent Wang
- Khaki's of Carmel
- Luxire Custom Clothing
- Meermin Mallorca
- MILER Menswear
- Need Supply Co.
- No Man Walks Alone
- Oliver Cabell
- once a day
- Pierpont Leather
- Portland Dry Goods
- Proper Cloth
- Ring Jacket
- S.E.H Kelly
- Self Edge
- Spier & Mackay
- Standard & Strange
- Suspension Point
- Taylor Stitch
- Uncle Otis
- Vanda Fine Clothing
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Yellow Hook Necktie
The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 1707post #25591 of 4831210/14/13 at 1:09ampost #25592 of 4831210/14/13 at 2:44ampost #25593 of 4831210/14/13 at 5:05ampost #25594 of 4831210/14/13 at 5:44am
I don't think it's any less reasonable to dislike the style or even corporate ethos of a maker, than it is to love one.
I have a deep and probably unreasonable loathing for Ferragamo, Gucci, Armani and a dozen other fashion brands, that took interesting and admirable histories of quality and design, and now use them to sell sub-supermarket plastic shit at premium prices to people confused by the brand association. There, I said it. Come to think of it, I think all of those now sell tacky watches too. Ugh.
But I can't immediately think of a watchmaker with a great history that now sells a poor-quality range at premium price to deceive customers in this way. As powerful, ubiquitous and generic as a Rolex or an Omega might seem these days, they still sell good stuff. Of course, whether it's $8k on a steel Omega or $1k on a Ferragamo "Tramezza" quality shoe, there are plenty of arguments that more for your money is available elsewhere. The difference is that Omega don't make a lookalike with their brand on it that's actually a cheap alloy quartz watch with a factory Chinese movement that's been made to look like a Speedmaster and sold at a similar price.
These watchmaker mega-brands are easy targets for inverted snobbery, as Dino said, and I think that's wrong: even if you can get a watch just as good for less money than a Rolex, a Rolex is still good nevertheless. That brand identity does have a value beyond vanity, in that it is genuinely a decades-old reputation for quality and consistency. What's more, part of that brand is design, and we are after all talking about things we buy for their aesthetic heritage and taste as much as anything. If there is anything more justifying of the word "iconic" in design, than a cyclops date or a Submariner's dial, or a Daytona, then it's hard to bring it immediately to mind. Even an Omega Constellation is an enduring and recognisable design that's worth something to someone.
So it's not right to despise a brand for its success or ubiquity, when the brand itself has quality and design integrity as its essence. Yet I understand where brother Roger is coming from in warning against chasing brand value as an end in itself. I don't think he was accusing anyone here of being a "brand whore" (except maybe Stitchy, who basks in that title I think!), or even saying one shouldn't by a particular brand. My interpretation was that he warned against buying the best-known for its own sake and stretching the budget just to get a watch that might seem more impressive to others. I think most of us can buy that ticket. Roger, Dino, Frilly, you're some of my favourite people on this forum, and this is by far the best thread. I felt rather disproportionately sad to see words of irritation here.
Back to Steven's question, then, I think my view as a PMW-buyer for the time being, is to look at more options. Not for its own sake, but there's a middle ground here, between doing what Roger warns against - getting something kind of expensive that might not seem right in six months, and buying something cheap that you're almost guaranteed to want to trade up in a short time. I don't know, maybe you just love those Hamiltons, and I think they're nice. I'm considering a Khaki for my son's next birthday (if he's interested). But not for me. Bill's "IntraMatic", for me, would feel like a substitute for a Nomos Orion - that isn't massively expensive either, but I guess in my crusty mind, Bauhaus should be German. The Khaki wants to be a IWC or even a Sinn or a Stowa. That's just how my mind works.
In your shoes, and in a way I am, I would get the cheapest watch that is something original in its own right. I bought the Seiko "Orange Monster" largely because it doesn't look like I really wanted a Submariner (and I totally do by the way!); it's got its own identity. I wouldn't buy a Hamilton Khaki for me, but I would buy a Stowa Flieger or Marine Original because the history matches up. In some ways it would go against my principles to pay more for one ETA-based watch over another, but as I said above, watches are art, and I don't want a pastiche or homage. At least not unless it's by one of the original artists. In dress watches, I wouldn't personally choose a minimalist Tissot or Hamilton like the one above, but I'd happily get a Junghans Max Bill.
At the end of the day, what it comes down to is this: if this is a new interest, you're going to see things and read things and try things on that will change your mind. However cussed and stubborn you might be (and believe me, I am), time and the world will influence you. So you could go one way and get something cheap that you may or may not still like in a year's time, like the Hamilton. Or you could get something so iconic and widely-respected that however many watches you have, it will probably always have a place in your collection - like a Rolex. What you can afford is your business alone. But somewhere in the middle of those two, there are a whole pile of watches with the originality and integrity of a Rolex, but closer to the price of a Hamilton. I'd say look at more, and work out what kind of watch you really want to be wearing most of the time right now - dressy, casual, sporty, a mix? Then look at what's there and where it comes from. What's the history of this design, or the company, what makes this particular watch so representative of that particular maker. And then, whether it's a Hamilton, an Omega or something in between, choose the one you really fucking love when you put it on your wrist and look in the mirror. That's it.post #25595 of 4831210/14/13 at 5:47ampost #25596 of 4831210/14/13 at 6:15ampost #25597 of 4831210/14/13 at 6:20ampost #25598 of 4831210/14/13 at 7:31amQuote:Quote:
did you read the last sentence of my post?post #25599 of 4831210/14/13 at 11:00ampost #25600 of 4831210/14/13 at 11:22ampost #25601 of 4831210/14/13 at 11:36ampost #25602 of 4831210/14/13 at 1:09pm
Had a SS sub rolex back in the 90's, I liked it but they have gotten better particularity the clasp. Also like what tutor is doing- and anyone who thinks its a lesser brand- what they are doing now is really cool without being trendy/disposable.
Still, for my next dive type watch I am leaning towards a Seiko SBDB001, but have yet to see in person.post #25603 of 4831210/14/13 at 1:27pmpost #25604 of 4831210/14/13 at 2:14pmQuote:Originally Posted by no frills
And now, a public service announcement. The photographer Jaroslav Wieczorkiewicz came up with a novel concept: dressing models in very, very, very fast-moving milk and taking pictures like traditional 1940s pinups. What does that even mean, you ask? Here's an example:
Profile of his work here via SLR lounge.com:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)The photographer's website here (warning: some photos are NSFW):
Also, just so this isn't completely OT, here's a picture of a watch: one of three known examples of the Patek 1563, a split seconds chrono variation of the 1463. This piece pictured also has luminous Breguet numerals, which the other two supposedly does not have. So apparently this is pretty rare, and will go up for auction via Christie's this November. All info via Christie's/pic via Hodinkee:
Friend of mine went to a press event hosted by Christie's last Friday where the Hodinkee guys snapped these pics. He has a pretty neat wrist shot of this piece. I asked him if he was going to bid for it, but I think the $850,000 to $1,500,000 estimate is beyond his budget.
You follow SLR Lounge regularly? My college buddy is one of the founders.post #25605 of 4831210/14/13 at 2:27pm
This thread is locked
- The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?
- › The official thrift/discount store bragging thread - Part II... 3 seconds ago
- › The Official RRL Thread 7 seconds ago
- › The Official Alden Thread for 2017 - Share Reviews, Sizing, Advice,... 1 minute ago
- › NIB Junkard Berry Shell Cordovan Size 42 (US 9) 2 minutes ago
- › The What Are You Wearing Today (WAYWT) Discussion Thread, Part II 2 minutes ago
- › Filson Bag Thread: With Pictures 4 minutes ago
- › Nigel Cabourn 5 minutes ago
- › The Apple Discussion Thread 5 minutes ago
- › Am I chasing a Unicorn? Slimfit jeans that sit on or above the waist? 8 minutes ago
- › Skoaktiebolaget – Carmina, John Lobb, Enzo Bonafè, Carlos Santos,... 9 minutes ago
- › Alden Brown analine (CXL) Plain toe blucher by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Men's Overlord Oxford, Brown, 8 D US by Lobster33
- › Alden #907 Straight Tip Bal Calfskin by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Leeds 2.0 Derby Men's Shoes Size US 10 D Walnut... by Lobster33
- › Dr. Martens Unisex Original 10 Eye Steel Toe Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Chippewa Men's Super Logger Waterproof Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Mosey Life Working Girl Travel Laptop Tote by sprout2
- › Allen Cox Brief trunks by sprout2
- › Sutor Mantellassi Men's C 567 Oxford by sprout2
- › Alden Burgundy Shell Cordovan Longwing by smfdoc
- › Five Menswear Trends for Fall
- › Don’t “Just Buy a New One”,...
- › Why Pay Such A Premium For Sunspel Or James...
- › In the Details: Lucian Föhr
- › A Sunday Drive: Styleforum Spring GMTOs
- › Should I dryclean my jeans, and if not, how...
- › The 5 Most-Hyped Handbags of the Moment
- › Eight Vignettes in Search of a (Wedding) Theme
- › The Kent Wang Cufflink Giveaway
- › Where to Buy a Last-Minute Wedding Suit for...