or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 1245  

post #18661 of 48312
lol, keep on keepin on, baby.
post #18662 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by dddrees View Post

Excellent,Congrats.

 

Looks like you need to take that baby out on a test drive, just to make sure everything is working like it is supposed to.nod[1].gif

 

Thanks. It seems only proper, 'no?  satisfied.gif

 

But seriously, the wife adores it. How could she not.

post #18663 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

lol, keep on keepin on, baby.

 

inorite... shog[1].gif

 

But here's the thing: I've stated my clear preference for the 3940 versus the 5140.  I feel that the relative proportions of the case size and subdial letterings for the 3940 work better than the 5140 (photo from Mech at PuristSpro):

 

 

 

I think the larger letterings work for the 5040 (which I have too), but because of the unique tonneau shape:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But what really comes across as a bit "off" to me about the 5140 is that squished up "27" in the date/moonphase subdial:

 

 

 

Which, interestingly enough, does NOT show up in the 5136/1J, despite the smaller case size (36/37mm versus the 5140's 39mm) and the larger letters in the other subdials:

 

 

 

I know I may be acting a bit unnecessarily nitpicky about this, and if someone wants to give me a 5140P for free I'm happy to own it.biggrin.gif

 

Just wanted to share my nitpicky thoughts with you folks.

post #18664 of 48312
I agree. smile.gif
post #18665 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

I agree. smile.gif

Aw hell I just noticed the "5" is squished in the 5140 too aside from the "27." - nitpicky frilly
post #18666 of 48312
Interesting. See, I actually prefer the 5140. Although I do love the 3940, the 5140 feels more balanced in regards to the north-south, and east-west orientations. I find the "north" of the 3940 to be a little bit stark and empty.

This is probably going to sound really stupid, but perhaps some numbers can help me? I feel like with the 5140, you have a "2" on the west, and a "2" on the east (with "1" being the standard unit of measurement. It is just supposed to be a proportional analysis). Additionally, with the north you have a "1" with the bigger text, and the south a "3" with the bigger moonphase. I feel like the north-south and east-west are balanced, even though the south of the dial is more occupied than the north.

As for the 3940, I will give east and west a "2," and the north maybe a ".75" and the south a "2.5."

I don't think this made any sense. But I swear in my head it sounds good. Also, I find the "busy"-ness of the moonphase in the 3940 to be a bit overwhelming in lieu of the simplicity of the other subdials.

This is, of course, picking the pickiest of nits.
post #18667 of 48312

I'm looking to buy my wife a new watch for our anniversary and have been drawn to the MoP dials and some with diamonds on the bezel. I would prefer an automatic watch rather than a quartz in the 3-5K range. I mostly have been landing on Omega DeVilles. She has a small wrist so 22/27/32mm I think would be best. I would appreciate your suggestions/recommendations.

 

 

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

 

 

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

post #18668 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

So it appears I have gotten the wife a proper (mechanical) Patek...........

 

 

 

But you've stopped buying watches for a while, I remember that.  I mean, after you bought the "endgame" watch...with a bonus extra watch for Madame.  Yep.  Can quite clearly see that your appetite is sated.  No problem here at all.  Who needs that house in the Hamptons anyway? crackup[1].gif

post #18669 of 48312
Hamilton jumps the shark.



Yes that is not one but two ETA movements in a watch that you have to physically flip around - you only see one dial and movement back at any one time.

Cherry on top of this? It's 53mm across.

So... basically it's a Reverso that rides the short bus? I'd love to see if watch #888 is ever sold.
post #18670 of 48312

I find that quite revolting.  Here's something I found pretty, to take your mind off it.

 

post #18671 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by no frills View Post

 

Thanks. It seems only proper, 'no?  satisfied.gif

 

But seriously, the wife adores it. How could she not.

And that's what matters the most.

 

Tell her congratulations, great choice.fing02[1].gif

post #18672 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimo View Post

I find that quite revolting.  Here's something I found pretty, to take your mind off it.


Thanks for the eyewash Mimo
post #18673 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by bboysdontcryy View Post

Been thinking about this. Yay or nay?

Might have to sell off a couple of watches and top up to buy this. It's more expensive than many of my kidneys put together.




Beat Haldimann is a one-man independent making watches mostly by hand. But I think watches is one product that does not benefit from the benchmade artisanal handmade process like suits or shoes. They benefit from tight tolerances and replaceability that can only be delivered by factory production and interchangeability.


After all, you would admire a pre-war Rolls Royce Phantom II with a coachbuilt chassis, but you wouldn't take it on a Grand Tour of the Continent. A modern Ferrari FF would be far more reliable. (Did I just call a Ferrari reliable?!)


Doesnt Omega have a central tourb as well? I think the Haldimann looks nice, but resale value and reliability and longevity of service is always the issue with independents. What's the retail price on that piece?
post #18674 of 48312
Quote:
Originally Posted by apropos View Post

A couple of German beauties. Classic looks, perfect proportions. I'd love to have either by my side.

(warning huge photos)

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
ALampS1815Up-DownPGref2340321_zps020483d5.jpg
ALampS1815Up-DownPGref2340322_zps9955f81e.jpg
heidi-klum-1180028492_zps293a3e67.jpg

I like how the subdials on the 1815 echo the... erm... subdials on the other model.

icon_gu_b_slayer[1].gif
post #18675 of 48312
Stitches - Yes Wempe. How did you guess?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)