Recent Images In This Thread
- brandCartiertagged by Murlsquirl, 2/28/15
- itemIWC Portuguese Automatic Steel Blue Mens Watch IW500107tagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryJewelry Watchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
- brandLeatherfoottagged by GauchoSF, 7/29/13
- itemNEVER WORN ROLEX SUBMARINER MENS WATCH 116619LBtagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- brandRolextagged by LA Guy, 10/7/13
- categoryWatchestagged by SYSTEM, 7/15/11
Related Forum Threads
- The Watch Appreciation Thread - Part two (Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, Jaeger... Last post on Today at 1:35 pm in Classic Menswear
- Top 5 sports watches under $1000 - a contest! Last post on 10/31/14 at 10:51am in Classic Menswear
- Men's watch at the $5K mark? Last post on 4/5/14 at 6:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Sub-$150 daily beater watch Last post on 7/18/16 at 4:55pm in Classic Menswear
- Poor man's watch thread Last post on Today at 9:16 am in Classic Menswear
The 5 Best Dress Watches Under $5,000 - as Voted by Styleforum!
Last edited: 2/2/16
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?Last edited: 2/8/16
- The 5 best Sport Watches under $1000 - as voted by Styleforum!Last edited: 2/2/16
- Allen Edmonds
- The Armoury
- Batch Mens
- Craftsman Clothing
- David Fin
- Deo Veritas
- Drinkwater's Cambridge
- Equus Leather
- Exquisite Trimmings
- Falcon Garments
- Freemans Sporting Club
- A Fine Pair of Shoes
- H. Stockton
- Gentlemen's Footwear
- The Hanger Project
- Henry Blake
- H.N. White
- House of Kydos
- John Elliott
- Kent Wang
- Khaki's of Carmel
- Luxire Custom Clothing
- Meermin Mallorca
- MILER Menswear
- Need Supply Co.
- No Man Walks Alone
- Oliver Cabell
- once a day
- Pierpont Leather
- Portland Dry Goods
- Proper Cloth
- Ring Jacket
- S.E.H Kelly
- Self Edge
- Spier & Mackay
- Standard & Strange
- Suspension Point
- Taylor Stitch
- Uncle Otis
- Vanda Fine Clothing
- Virtual Clotheshorse
- Yellow Hook Necktie
The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...) - Page 985post #14761 of 4831210/23/12 at 9:12amThanks Dino, great insights. I've always enjoyed the original Jumbo design, down to the font used for the '7' in the shot above. Minor detail obviously, but I thought it would've been nice if they'd kept that for the new 15202.post #14762 of 4831210/23/12 at 9:54amQuote:
The original font on the date wheel is very cool. As mentioned, I believe its probably different, but I'll let you know when I get to the 7th. No quickset on the date of the 15202s.Quote:Originally Posted by CHRK33
The past week or so has seen very helpful discussion of the RO 15202 and I, for one, have been following the discussion with great interest as I am debating going with the 15400 vs. the 15202.
I agree that the 15202 is iconic, but I do think that the updated 15400 in 41mm merits strong consideration for daily wear. I think there are advantages to the larger 41MM size (being 6'3, I think it transitions from dressy to casual a bit better), as well as a personal preference for the type font and AP positioning on the 15400. Additionally, the 15400 with blue dial is available to me NIB from Audemars boutique in Milan for 10K euros whereas the 15202 would cost 18000Euros; a pretty significant difference in price that is a factor (for me at least).
I would really welcome anyone's thoughts on the 15400 (many of you have a lot more experience with Royal Oaks than me); I am really firmly on the fence, but leaning towards the 15400 currently. Thanks in advance.
The 15300 and 15400 are great choices especially if one is maybe a bit harder on a watch and both give you a quickset for the date, and also the are each significantly less expensive than a 15202. I'd feel less badly about banging a 15300/15400 around a bit, compared to a 15202. Part of the price is that the 15202 is an ultra thin sport watch and has an ultra thin automatic movement, and its produced in much smaller numbers than a 15300 or 15400. Years ago, it was very significant to make thin movements and thin watch cases. The cal 2120 is famous and very costly to produce. With the trend favoring larger watches, ultra thins matter less to some people today.
There really isn't a bad choice. Its what you are more comfortable with in terms of fit and cost. I tried on several ROs before deciding...including the 15300, 15400, the 39mm ROC I believe 26300, and its replacement the 41mm RO Chronograph. For me it came down to the Jumbo 15202 or the 41mm chronograph. I greatly prefered the dial, lack of second hand, and the iconic design, the famous movement and that its closer to the original design than a 15300/15400. The 15400 although nice, I just did not think the proportions worked as well as on its predecessor the 15300. I'm sure technically everything was enlarged by the same percentage, but to me the bezel and case size looked more balanced and correct at 39mm rather than 41. The 15400 looked larger, but a bit empty, having to shift the date inward a bit on the dial and I didn't like the wider metal ring shape holding the saphire crystal on the back making it evident the movement was from a smaller watch and just got recased. But those were my personal hang ups with the 15400, but if you like it its a great watch. I think the RO Chrono at 41 worked out a bit better since they had the subdials filling out the dial. In the end I have some chronographs, and I just thought everything about the Jumbo came together perfectly. I hope to get another AP some day, but I bought with the mindset if I only ever buy one, which would I most want to own. After trying each on, the decision became easy.
I'm not very hard on my watches, and its not something I would bang around like maybe one of my Rolex watches. If I were going to treat it that way, maybe I'd have more strongly considered a 15300/15400 which has a thicker case and might better withstand some harsh treatment (although I know guys that have worn 15202 Jumbos as daily wearers). Also with a 15300/15400 you will get a quickset date. Try each one on and see what you think, and consider how you will use/wear it (are you tough on watches), and do you need a quickset date. AP makes great products and each version of the RO can be a great choice for differnet people.post #14763 of 4831210/23/12 at 10:08ampost #14764 of 4831210/23/12 at 10:31ampost #14765 of 4831210/23/12 at 12:07pmQuote:Quote:Originally Posted by Dino944
The 15400 although nice, I just did not think the proportions worked as well as on its predecessor the 15300. I'm sure technically everything was enlarged by the same percentage, but to me the bezel and case size looked more balanced and correct at 39mm rather than 41. The 15400 looked larger, but a bit empty, having to shift the date inward a bit on the dial and I didn't like the wider metal ring shape holding the saphire crystal on the back making it evident the movement was from a smaller watch and just got recased. But those were my personal hang ups with the 15400, but if you like it its a great watch.
Between the 15300 and 15400 I prefer the former, with regards to size, proportions and dial layout. I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that AP simply copy/pasted the existing movement into a larger case. It's for this reason that the date window on the 15400 is located at a greater distance from the bezel, and that the dial of the 15300 appears to be more harmonious by comparison. The 15400 is certainly a nice watch by any measure, but to me the entire 41mm series is a "tweener" - too big for a RO, yet too small for a ROO. If it were to be my first AP purchase, I would tend towards one end or the other and avoid the middle... just my 2 cents.post #14766 of 4831210/23/12 at 12:17pmQuote:
The date font appears different to me, as the 7 lacks the slight downwards stroke (see pic). And while we're talking similarities/differences between generations of ultra thins, I discovered that a few 15202 owners have actually swapped out dials for those of earlier generations to get their "ideal" combination of logo placement, font size, etc . I wouldn't go through either the trouble or expense myself, but it goes to show that there's room for customization with AP.post #14767 of 4831210/23/12 at 1:03pmQuote:Originally Posted by medtech_expat
I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that AP simply copy/pasted the existing movement into a larger case. It's for this reason that the date window on the 15400 is located at a greater distance from the bezel, and that the dial of the 15300 appears to be more harmonious by comparison.
Yes, you are correct. The movement of the 39mm 15300 was removed and placed in the 41mm case of the 15400, changing the distance of the date window to the bezel. I think it worked a bit better in the chronograph because of the subdials and because the chronograph is a thicker case.
The best thing a potential buyer can do is try them on, before buying.post #14768 of 4831210/23/12 at 1:08pmQuote:
Glad it was helpful. I strongly recommend trying them on if possible before making a final decision. Keep us posted on your thought process and shopping experience. Good luck!post #14769 of 4831210/23/12 at 1:13pmQuote:Originally Posted by medtech_expat
The date font appears different to me, as the 7 lacks the slight downwards stroke (see pic). And while we're talking similarities/differences between generations of ultra thins, I discovered that a few 15202 owners have actually swapped out dials for those of earlier generations to get their "ideal" combination of logo placement, font size, etc . I wouldn't go through either the trouble or expense myself, but it goes to show that there's room for customization with AP.
That's actually a prior generation of 15202. So I don't know that the photo used is a definite answer to which font is used on the 2012 Jumbo 15202.
Interesting that people have swapped dials. Although, in the collectible world that devalues a watch.post #14770 of 4831210/23/12 at 3:42pmwell, i am not going to be owning that transocean from work i posted earlier. but at least its staying in the family. just sold it to my brother.
what a great looking watch.
question - where to get a great fake i can swap it out with?post #14771 of 4831210/23/12 at 5:13pmpost #14772 of 4831210/23/12 at 6:56pmQuote:
+1. those are the 2 i really like.
man alive, if i wasnt jet set on a panny, that watch would be on my wrist now. and to think, we bought both of those watches at once, for next to nothing. ahh, if only to be the boss. thankfully, now that both watches have been sold, i can get them off my mind.post #14773 of 4831210/23/12 at 9:49pmpost #14774 of 4831210/24/12 at 7:08ampost #14775 of 4831210/24/12 at 7:16am
This thread is locked
- The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breitling, JLC etc...)
- Should I Wear a Watch to a Wedding?
- › The official John Elliott B&S&T thread 8 minutes ago
- › ***The Official Rick Owens Thread*** 10 minutes ago
- › John Elliott - official affiliate thread 12 minutes ago
- › Raw Ingredient and Mise en Place porn thread. 14 minutes ago
- › Red Wing for J Crew Backman Boots 17 minutes ago
- › Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2017- News, Pictures, Clothing,... 18 minutes ago
- › The Home Ownership Thread 21 minutes ago
- › Taylor Stitch - Official Affiliate Thread 22 minutes ago
- › The official thrift/discount store bragging thread - Part II... 25 minutes ago
- › Styleforum's "Just what Santa should have brought" Viberg GMTO... 26 minutes ago
- › Alden Brown analine (CXL) Plain toe blucher by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Men's Overlord Oxford, Brown, 8 D US by Lobster33
- › Alden #907 Straight Tip Bal Calfskin by smfdoc
- › Allen Edmonds Leeds 2.0 Derby Men's Shoes Size US 10 D Walnut... by Lobster33
- › Dr. Martens Unisex Original 10 Eye Steel Toe Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Chippewa Men's Super Logger Waterproof Boot by JC Echeverry
- › Mosey Life Working Girl Travel Laptop Tote by sprout2
- › Allen Cox Brief trunks by sprout2
- › Sutor Mantellassi Men's C 567 Oxford by sprout2
- › Alden Burgundy Shell Cordovan Longwing by smfdoc
- › The Current Popular Menswear Pieces
- › Five Menswear Trends for Fall
- › Don’t “Just Buy a New One”,...
- › Why Pay Such A Premium For Sunspel Or James...
- › In the Details: Lucian Föhr
- › A Sunday Drive: Styleforum Spring GMTOs
- › Should I dryclean my jeans, and if not, how...
- › The 5 Most-Hyped Handbags of the Moment
- › Eight Vignettes in Search of a (Wedding) Theme
- › The Kent Wang Cufflink Giveaway