edinatlanta
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 43,012
- Reaction score
- 17,353
Well yeah, i mean, they can blow them out and still not cover the spread.
Also, the one thing I always hate (literally hate, not "literally) is when dudes are like "well FSU is known to choke" (not hating on you MrG...at least not this time). It is Platonic Form of a fallacious argument. This program is vastly different from Bowden's (it's only the same in that the institution is still there) they are better coached, clearly more focused etc. Plus, the teams change every four years. Anyway I've had enough posts about stupid sports fallacies in multiple threads in multiple websites this week so I'm going to take a breather and debate putting the n00b for this threak on ignore.
I honestly think there's a fair argument either way (e.g. FSU blowout or closer than expected). Yeah, the numbers support the possibility that FSU could absolutely crush Miami, but we're talking about college football, which is so entertaining partially because things like rivalry games can defy stats-based expectations. Plus, FSU isn't exactly immune to choking.
So, yeah, there's not a chance in hell I'd take Miami straight-up, but the line right now is FSU -21.5. I'm not a gambling man, but, if I were, Miami and the points would be very, very tempting.
Well yeah, i mean, they can blow them out and still not cover the spread.
Also, the one thing I always hate (literally hate, not "literally) is when dudes are like "well FSU is known to choke" (not hating on you MrG...at least not this time). It is Platonic Form of a fallacious argument. This program is vastly different from Bowden's (it's only the same in that the institution is still there) they are better coached, clearly more focused etc. Plus, the teams change every four years. Anyway I've had enough posts about stupid sports fallacies in multiple threads in multiple websites this week so I'm going to take a breather and debate putting the n00b for this threak on ignore.