or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › No effs given... correctly
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

No effs given... correctly - Page 27

post #391 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantabrigian View Post

What do people think about Patrick Johnson?

Just another Pitti?

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

I was trying to find something nice about this, but even his shoes are terrible. The suit and shirt do work together, but he should've sized up. I don't think this is NFG according to our definition. You can deviate from the rules, but fit is the only rule you cannot deviate from.

post #392 of 477

NFG? I don't know, but personally, I think that color demands NFG. 

post #393 of 477
I wish he'd given one fuck about all of the clashing reds in that fit.
post #394 of 477
Some of these recent pictures missed the "correctly" at the end of the thread title.
post #395 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterFu View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

NFG? I don't know, but personally, I think that color demands NFG. 

The red square really ruins it for me, it almost looks like he got shot in the chest. Otherwise I'd say this might be NFG done correctly.

post #396 of 477

Would this be NFG done correctly? Or is it more peacock? Or just plain bad?

(Maybe it's NFG because I'll keep wearing it, no matter what you say)

post #397 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeyface View Post

I was trying to find something nice about this, but even his shoes are terrible. The suit and shirt do work together, but he should've sized up. I don't think this is NFG according to our definition. You can deviate from the rules, but fit is the only rule you cannot deviate from.

This super-slimfit nonsense is just terrible. If you are an athletic build, you can get away with it and not lot look laughable, but you'll still look like someone following a now terribly overexposed fashion trend.

 

Worse is that the tailor and fit threads here on SF are now littered with pictures of first time suit buyers with less than ideal builds who look ridiculous in their too-short, pre-shrunk suits from china. It is the bell-bottoms of this era.


Edited by MisterFu - 6/5/13 at 8:33pm
post #398 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeyface View Post

Would this be NFG done correctly? Or is it more peacock? Or just plain bad?

(Maybe it's NFG because I'll keep wearing it, no matter what you say)

I kinda like it. I'd wear that jacket. Where's it from?

post #399 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterFu View Post

I kinda like it. I'd wear that jacket. Where's it from?

Thanks, it's suitsupply.

post #400 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterFu View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeyface View Post

I was trying to find something nice about this, but even his shoes are terrible. The suit and shirt do work together, but he should've sized up. I don't think this is NFG according to our definition. You can deviate from the rules, but fit is the only rule you cannot deviate from.
This super-slimfit nonsense is just terrible. If you are an athletic build, you can get away with it and not lot look laughable, but you'll still look like someone following a now terribly overexposed fashion trend.

Worse is that the tailor and fit threads here on SF are now littered with pictures of first time suit buyers with less than ideal builds who look ridiculous in their too-short, pre-shrunk suits from china. It is the bell-bottoms of this era.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


Did you ask this guy if he wanted to be your example? I know he posted it and you're "free" to do what you want with it, but that's kinda uncool if you didn't.
post #401 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarbutch View Post

Did you ask this guy if he wanted to be your example? I know he posted it and you're "free" to do what you want with it, but that's kinda uncool if you didn't.

this.
post #402 of 477
sidebar - chicks looks hot in bell bottoms.

what says ya'll about d-wade?





post #403 of 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

sidebar - chicks looks hot in bell bottoms.

what says ya'll about d-wade?

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 


Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)



 

Pretty much all tomfoolery except this look.  His "style" is pretty schizophrenic.  Hoping on trends like preteen.  

post #404 of 477
D-Wade has a stylist who selects all of this crap for him, as outlined here: http://www.gq.com/sports/profiles/201304/nba-fashion-style-dwyane-wade-lebron-james-russell-westbrook

The first look would be fine without that ridiculous tie. Of course, my assessment stipulates that there aren't any dumb-ass sneakers out of the frame.
post #405 of 477
Or, to put it in terms of this thread: Many fucks were given.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › No effs given... correctly