Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
Rather than grip at the wrist, it sits on the brim of your hand. Much more comfortable. Also, I conjecture that it consequently helps the sleeve drape better.
I haven't found that the grip of the cuff helps with sleeve drape (ie. sleeves disappearing up the coat's sleeves). The height of the shirt's armhole relative to the coat along with the fit of the shirt seem to affect it more. Even wearing a thick-ass watch like an IWC 3706 (yes, it's not thick compared to the monstrosities in vogue these days) without an adjustment to the cuff diameter doesn't affect it too much unless the cuff gets caught up on the watch itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
Not my cup of tea, but here is a Paul Stuart shirt in what they call "chambray," with French cuffs and a white collar to boot:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
This looks like the first "chambray" that Will sold, that turned out to be voile. I like that SG voile, too. The actual chambray seems like it's halfway to denim, by comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RDiaz
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
(these pictures show the unfastened cuff, with the button in the "barrel" position, then passed through the buttonhole so it becomes "invisible" and ready for links)
I must just not get the appeal of casual single cuffs, and these pictures show exactly why. They look like someone's home craft project, especially with the button cuff links. Single-cuffs only look right to me in the context of formalwear: stiff interlining, white cloth, metallic links. To paraphrase our resident (young) architect, the design of the cuff is inauthentic to the material used --- it's trying to pretend to be something it's not.