Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quadcammer 
is that right?
It is certain.
Precisely what you define as 'poor' is a good question. Here is my definition:
1. The weight of the cloth is never stated. 100 is a standard shirt weight particularly for e.g. twill, below this it is too heavy. 170+ is exceptionally good (thin).
2. The origin of the cotton is never stated, my shirtmaker is adamant Egyptian is the finest.
3. The cotton mill is never stated, e.g. Acorn is the cloth I prefer (a Lancashire mill, UK). There must be lots of quality Italian mills.
4. The location of the shirt construction is not stated, e.g. London, Italy
If none are stated then unless its a designer with an excellent reputation, e.g. Hermes or RL 'made in Italy', RLPL, then its not a good sign. The shirts in the CT introductory offer are £20-30 each ($30 - $45). The fact CT use Egyptian cotton as a selling point and charge the highest price for their Egyptian cotton white shirts suggests they think its good too.
Thomas Pink do a nice Imperial 170 at a reasonable price for quality check comparison (~£150).