BUMP
So, embarrassing as it may be to admit, I haven't seen True Romance. I just jotted down some thoughts:
-It seems a little weird that Tony Scott directed this movie. It doesn't really seem to fit in with the rest of his oeuvre. It seems a lot more like Tarantino's baby - from the dialog to the use of certain tropes (e.g. kung fu movies, old pop music, the focus on crime, etc.)
The end result ends up feeling a bit more middle-of-the-road, like it's not wholly from either camp. Most of Tarantino's best stuff benefits from a certain cartoonish, comic book, exploitation aesthetic. That aesthetic is mostly missing here, which isn't necessarily a good thing.
It's easy to see how other people trying to ape Tarantino's style ended up producing so much garbage in the mid 90's.
-The whole thing feels like it's quite indebted to films like, say...I dunno, maybe Raising Arizona or Wild At Heart. However, True Romance lacks the aesthetic "vision" (sorry) of the Coens or Lynch. Maybe it's just a case of too many cooks in the kitchen.
-Or maybe it's just the dang marimbas.
-Didn't even recognize Gary Oldman. The man is a treasure.
-It's funny how Detroit from 20 years ago still seems like a post-apocalyptic world from 50 years in the future.
Altogether, not one of the worst Badlands imitations out there.