GG Allin
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2012
- Messages
- 2,059
- Reaction score
- 2,049
The first time I read Proust it was barely more than total gibberish to me. Last summer I read the (I think unjustly) celebrated George Painter biography of him, which gave me a pretty good framework with which to attack the work again. It requires a remarkable degree of concentration to read him, but if you've looked into some works in continental philosophy before, it is no harder than most of those I think.how do IT dorks come to have read proust. hardly anyone i meet in the art world has read proust.
i actually went to a talk a while back by a world-renowned joyce expert who banged on for ages about repetition structures in finnegans wake, fine but at the end i tried to contrast proust as a set of repetitive iterations bounded by the horizonality of death (a la deleuze's proust and signs). the guy just sighed, said he'd tried proust, read a passage about milk boiling on a stove and just decided 'meh, this is too ocd for me'
I don't have kids though, and I'm certainly not an IT guy--so those things probably helped.
hahaha i would really like to read ulysses one day. it's one of those books i should've just taken a course on it back in college.
It will be hard for you to dedicate the time and concentration to reading "Ulysses", if you have a child and a demanding job--but, if you can, it is highly rewarding. I think it's the greatest novel I've ever read, although I'm starting to think Proust may be overtaking him in my estimation. I became so obsessed with it that I actually went and lived in Dublin for a year.
The amount of references to subjects that nobody knows anything about in "Ulysses" requires at least a few good guidebooks to be read simultaneously, like the "Ulysses annotated" one, or "the bloomsday book."
I've picked up "Finnegan's wake" once in my life, and put it down after like 30 pages or something--having understood nothing of what I'd read.