• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

2013 Academy Award Nominations

ethanm

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
10,323
Reaction score
3,463
People always talk about artistic license, where is the artistic restraint?
 

lefty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
10,773
Reaction score
4,595
Well, that was a bloody mess. McFarlane auditioning for his own variety show.

lefty
 
Last edited:

tullytra

Senior Member
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
607
Reaction score
11
I wasn't quite sure whether Tarantino was insulting his actors or giving backhanded compliments when he started talking about the characters he created. Then it all came together when he said how well he'd chosen the cast for the characters. Jamie Foxx looked a bit unsure of where the speech was heading when they showed him.
 

Pennglock

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
3,431
Reaction score
535
Seth MacFarlane: meanspirited, yet completely unfunny.

Lame jokes and even worse sense of timing...

The vaguely sociopathic vibe Ive always gotten from Family Guy becomes wholly explicit when seeing this guy in person.

This guy is the antichrist and the continuing popularity of his projects is evidence that Mike Judge's Idiocrity is closer than we think.
 

lefty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
10,773
Reaction score
4,595
^ It was noticeable how off his timing was. Nerves perhaps. To me SM comes across as a smug asshole.

lefty
 

Reggs

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
6,219
Reaction score
698
Seth MacFarlane seems so cynical that I would not expect him to have any close friends, or fall in love. That said, I enjoyed his hosting more than I thought I would because of the awkwardness.

Ben Affleck's comment about his marriage being a lot of work was strange.

As soon as the Ted skit started, I told my fiancee that the ADL would get it's panties in a bunch. Sure enough...

http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/02/2...ollywood-sketch-from-academy-awards-ceremony/
 

Lionheart Biker

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,079
Reaction score
1,483
Mcfarlane was better than previous years hosts, but he did seem a bit awkward and I agree about the timing. Odd pauses and transitioning from one joke to the other. Capt Kirk sorta saved the opening act.

Re Ben affleck´s speech, that was one hell of a mess. He could barely get a word out and it was painfully obvious he was damn mad at the Academy for not getting a Director´s nomination.
 
Last edited:

edinatlanta

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
43,027
Reaction score
17,376
So how do they determine best editing, sound editing and sound mixing? Its so technical that to laymen (or it could just be I'm an idiot) that they're all the same. I know they aren't...
 

lefty

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
10,773
Reaction score
4,595
Each branch nominates within their own category: directors nominate directors, editors nominate editors, etc. They vote for 5 in order of preference and these are used to determine the official nominations in a preferential voting system (look it up). Once that's done every member of the academy votes for a winner in each category.

So to answer your question - professionals nominate the best achievements in their technical category, say cinematography; then amateurs vote for the best cinematography based on, "I thought the colours were pretty."

lefty
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106

That's a different discussion and valid only if the film claims to be the truth. It doesn't. "Because we say it's based on a true story, rather than this is a true story, we're allowed to take some dramatic license." Ben Affleck Trust me, I'm Canadian and didn't appreciate the slight it paid the Canadians who risked their lives and had the direct hand in saving those six people. I found it funny that Affleck had to change the end title card after a near revolt at TIFF. But when I judge a film for an Academy Award I put all that aside and ask a few simple questions - does the film tell a compelling story? Did it achieve what it set out to do? In this case it does. I don't particularly give a **** what the story is. That's the point of a Best Picture award. lefty
this is damn well said.
It's because he IS a smug asshole.
id like to hope that if i ever that much money, i can hold back from being a smug asshole. -- im just glad walz won. i love that dude.
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106

Each branch nominates within their own category: directors nominate directors, editors nominate editors, etc. They vote for 5 in order of preference and these are used to determine the official nominations in a preferential voting system (look it up). Once that's done every member of the academy votes for a winner in each category.

So to answer your question - professionals nominate the best achievements in their technical category, say cinematography; then amateurs vote for the best cinematography based on, "I thought the colours were pretty."  

lefty


lefty, your posts here are both highly informative, and very funny. bravo.
 

edinatlanta

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
43,027
Reaction score
17,376
So it is as esoteric as I thought. I can't imagine how one could find superior sound editing. And shouldn't an editor and their work NOT be noticed?

+1 on the lefty love. He's the one poster I have an sf crush on. You know its real because it didn't abate when I learned of his canadianism.

Another question. I imagine that within the academy there are like everywhere else there are factions with their own preferences and biases. Can you say roughly and generally what exists now and if one bloc has significant sway? basically give me some clues so I can make money betting on the Oscars next year.

Each branch nominates within their own category: directors nominate directors, editors nominate editors, etc. They vote for 5 in order of preference and these are used to determine the official nominations in a preferential voting system (look it up). Once that's done every member of the academy votes for a winner in each category.

So to answer your question - professionals nominate the best achievements in their technical category, say cinematography; then amateurs vote for the best cinematography based on, "I thought the colours were pretty."  

lefty
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,933
Messages
10,592,908
Members
224,336
Latest member
Chocolate Factory
Top