or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Official Wedding Attire Question/Answer/Picture Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Wedding Attire Question/Answer/Picture Thread - Page 18

post #256 of 2077
Excellent. Thanks, RogerC.
post #257 of 2077
Yeah, sometimes Cego (Carl) will do a single shirt if its for a wedding. He did for me. Highly recommended.
post #258 of 2077
Thanks, aravenel.

Can somebody give me an indication of which of these two would be more appropriate to wear with black tie? On model 101273 (the top link) the toebox and uppers are pulled over the stitching to conceal it, which is not the case with model 101198 (the second link) as seen below. I tried posting images but even at a large setting it was difficult to see the detail I'm describing.

http://meermin.es/ficha_articulo.php?id=1925

http://meermin.es/ficha_articulo.php?id=2033


I actually think it's a somewhat elegant detail but that's to my noob eye. Thoughts?
post #259 of 2077
Thread Starter 
I can't really see in the pics bc I'm on my phone but I think I know the detail you are describing. Personally I prefer the visible stitching. Other looks somehow prophylactic.
post #260 of 2077
Quote:
Originally Posted by pasoguava View Post

Thanks, aravenel.

Can somebody give me an indication of which of these two would be more appropriate to wear with black tie? On model 101273 (the top link) the toebox and uppers are pulled over the stitching to conceal it, which is not the case with model 101198 (the second link) as seen below. I tried posting images but even at a large setting it was difficult to see the detail I'm describing.

http://meermin.es/ficha_articulo.php?id=1925

http://meermin.es/ficha_articulo.php?id=2033


I actually think it's a somewhat elegant detail but that's to my noob eye. Thoughts?

Both designs are lovely but not ideal for black tie. For black tie, you should go with a plain toe balmoral (no stitching or punch caps).
post #261 of 2077
Quote:
Other looks somehow prophylactic.

Cannot. . . unsee. . .

Well, you both bring up good points. May very well need to look at the Kent Wang's again.
post #262 of 2077
Either one
post #263 of 2077

Hi All,

 

I am really new here and I have a lot to learn.  I stupidly posted this in a new thread and was directed here. 

 

I'm getting married in the fall and I have instructed the groomsman to wear black-tie dress with a few requirements (like only a black bow tie, black cummerbund/waist coat).  I am being told by numerous individuals (and I read in some guides) that, as the groom, I should be differentiated from the rest of the groomsmen (i.e., that I should stand out from the group). 

 

My question is, what can I do (if I even need to), to stand out, without destroying the black-tie ensemble.  It seems to me that black-tie by nature allows for little variation.  I suppose I could go white tie but I would rather not.  Instead, I would like to purchase a high quality, traditional tux that I can use in the future.  Not sure if it matters, but the wedding ceremony will be in a NYC church.

 

Any ideas, input, from this community would be much appreciated. The early response is that I should stick with traditional black tie. 

 

Thanks in advance!

post #264 of 2077
You do not need to be differentiated. No one is going to mistake you for anyone other than the groom.

If you really want to, get a boutonniere, or one of a different color than the groomsmen. But don't go screwing with the black-tie basics and wear a colored cummerbund or something--that's insta-fail.
post #265 of 2077

There are some ways to stand apart, without ruining black tie.  You could ask your groomsmen to wear cummerbunds, while you wear a waistcoat, or vice versa.  You could add a boutonniere, or add a pocket square for a splash of colour.  You could also wear a homburg - it would be under your arm in the church, of course, not on your head.  www.blacktieguide.com is a good resource, and includes pages on where you can add some individuality to your ensemble.

post #266 of 2077
Vodwat, stick with traditional black tie. There is no need as the groom to differentiate yourself because everyone will know you're the groom. Acceptable variations on black tie largely center around the jacket (SB peak lapel, SB shawl lapel, DB peak lapel, DB shawl lapel OR midnight blue / black), cufflinks / studs used, patent oxfords vs. opera pumps, wing vs. turndown collar for a peak lapel tuxedo, pleat front vs. marcella front shirt. You could wear something differentiated, but (1) it looks odd to have everyone wear the same thing except the groom IMO and (2) if everyone is wearing their own tuxedo, there's going to be some variation so you'll just appear to be wearing one version of black tie among many.
post #267 of 2077
If you want to differentiate, think about the waistcoats: cummerbunds for the rest, waistcoat for you, or black waistcoats for the rest, white marcella for you.
post #268 of 2077
Give all of them a uniform boutonniere, and then get a unique on for yourself.


Or


Be the only one with a slick, white pocket square.


Or



Be the only one with a vest.


And an echo of what Roger posted, as another alternative.
post #269 of 2077
Awesome suggestions guys....just for clarity, when you say slick white pocket square, do you mean high quality, or what exactly makes it slick?
post #270 of 2077
Oh...just nice quality and placed in a stylish way....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Official Wedding Attire Question/Answer/Picture Thread