Quote:
Originally Posted by
redcaimen 
There are two methods currently in use by plastic surgeons (I think some Dermatologists are also qualified to perform the technique).
The first involves several visits and is somewhat time consuming. Basically a medical strength wart remover is poured onto a heavy duty cotton ball and taped down onto your nipple. Its uncomfortable and you have to keep coming back every few days for a re-application.
The second is faster but more complicated. First a mold is made of your nipples and the protuberance is carefully removed and a sort of caldera is formed. The material the mold is made out of is highly resistant to low temperatures. I think most people are restrained in some way or sedated- Personally, I would choose both - and liquid hydrogen is carefully poured into the reservoir. The mold/chest guard is quickly removed and the medical equivalent of a jewelers hammer is employed to "tap" off the offending tips. (the sound this makes is reported to be quite similar to the tinkle of a wine glass) Apparently there is little pain at the time but post operative recuperation is rumored to be something of an ordeal but may be worth it as Duct absess and related post op problems are less likely than in long term application of wart remover.
I was hoping someone would challenge me but apparently we have gone so far down the Botox/Facelift/Pec implants rabbit hole that my attempt to come up with an obviously ridiculous set of procedures for reducing nipple "observability " ( as if there would be any procedures at all!) has failed. Personally, I love Farrah Fawcett pacifier nipples.