Aren't most forums?


Sorry, you're not getting off that easy. You started this shit storm of "happy wife, happy life" comments and savant posters that can tell based on one clothing dispute with your girl that you must immediately dump her. If we have to endure this thread that won't die, you do too. We demand pictures of the girl in question and a poll on whether to continue the relationship or not.



FTFY.

The question is does she know anything about men's clothes, and hence is criticising things for legitimate reasons; or is she just projecting her own preconceived notions of fashion. I would guess the latter. Then - is her fashion sense actually right on some of the things? Example - opera pumps, in my opinion, do actually look effeminate and ridiculous on a man. Just because they are traditional does not mean they aren't ugly, ridiculous, and likely to get you laughed at by anyone under 60.
I'd approach it like this - explain and show her the *reasons* why black tie rules exist. Www.blacktieguide.com is useful for a quick crash course. Example - the cummerbund. Its function is not to be seen, but simply to cover the part beneath the jacket button, so that you don't get an unsightly little white strip of shirt showing through. Since your jacket should be buttoned up the whole time you are wearing it, it will cover almost all of the cummberbund. So, the cummerbund, if chosen in the correct colour (i.e. black) is basically invisible. The ONLY time it is seen is when, if you were not wearing one (and had no waistcoat instead), the shirt front bottom would be showing - which looks a lot uglier than a patch of black cummerbund.
Next: bow tie vs normal tie. The reason a bow tie is worn, is not to look like a penguin or a 60 something WASP Republican, but to avoid having a tie dropping into your dinner. It is, after all, called a DINNER SUIT - you will be eating/drinking several courses at a table for 2+ hours, the last thing you want is a waist-length tie flopping around in the gravy or red wine and getting it and your white shirt stained. Ties also tend to get out of place when dancing, carousing, and so on. Plus, a BLACK bow tie with a dinner suit, looks sharp (google some pics of Connery/007 and show her).
Patents vs black oxfords. Personally I'd avoid patents - simply because a well-polished black oxford does the job just as well. Why spend money on a shoe you will wear a few times a year at most, when an existing must-have wardrobe staple can do it. The reason to have patent leather is to match the sheen effect of the bow tie and the lapels (grosgrain etc) - but really, no one looks at your feet so IMO this effect is wasted (and tiny anyway). So, I'd concede on this one and just bring normal black oxfords.
Peak lapels vs notch. The reason for peak lapels is to emphasise the v-shape of a man's torso. Dinner suits are fitted more tightly, and the one-button design gives more of a classic v-shape silhouette. Peak lapels enhance this. Plus, it distinguishes it from a normal business suit. Notch lapels aren't 'wrong' but peak look better, in most people's opinion, and they are more trad.
Finally, convince her by demonstration - get a classic black tie rig with peak (grosgrain facing) lapels, one button, black bow tie and black cummerbund (both grosgrain also), either well-shined oxfords or patent leather if you want, marcella front dress shirt with turndown collar (wing collar is more for white tie, and looks more 'fussy' IMO), with either studs or buttons, and onyx &silver cufflinks. Get dressed in your dinner suit, place a bottle of champagne and an ice bucket in the bedroom, light some scented candles and put on some seductive music when she gets back home. Walk in, do your best 007 impersonation, and then screw her brains out for the next 2 hours. After that, you won't hear any bullshit about black suits and skinny ties.
