Quote:
I'm not sure Wynton Marsalis is controversial
Wynton is controversial not because he is commercial, but because he claims to know what "true" jazz is, and, more importantly, what it isn't. Â He proceeds to play only what he thinks is "true" jazz, and the logical, and obviously preposterous conclusion is, "unless it sounds like Wynton, it isn't jazz." Â I'm overstating of course, but I think the point is clear. Â But that alone would not necessarily have made him controversial. Â His definition of jazz happens to lack the key element that has defined jazz throughout its history -- innovation. Â By putting straight-ahead, blues- and standards-based jazz under a glass canopy like a museum piece and declaring it the only true form of jazz, he goes fundamentally against the genre's basic philosophy of innovation and experimentation. Â That is why he is controversial. There is another dimension that made him controversial -- racial. Â For that, though, we have Wynton's ridiculous boosters like Stanley Crouch to thank, rather than Wynton himself. Â Crouch and others have insinuated, without actually coming out and saying it, that because jazz was developed by African-Americans, they are somehow fundamentally better at playing it today than people of other backgrounds. There was an excellent article in the March 2003 issue Atlantic Monthly on Wynton. Â It's not available online for free, unfortunately, but if you have access to Atlantic back issues, I highly recommend it. Regards, artdeco73