Having a waist covering with a single-breasted dinner suit is tradition. This being said: most people wearing dinner suits these days skip it unfortunately (don't know why since a cummerbund is neither particularly expensive nor uncomfortable).
By the way: If you wear a cummerbund it should be of the same material (gross grain or satin) like lapel facings and bow tie. Edited by AlexE - 10/13/12 at 12:12pm
Thank you for the replies. I wanted to go for a less traditional black tie look (if that's not an oxymoron). I think any color cummerbund other than black makes the wearer look like a waiter. As the bow tie typically matches the cummerbund, though, this would limit me to a black tie. Would a black cummerbund with a black and silver paisley bow tie be alright, even though it wouldn't match the cummerbund, strictly speaking?
To my knowledge it has its origins in the adoption of tribal warrior "cummerbunds" by British military officers in South Asia. It then became part of civilian dinner suits (like other military uniform characteristics such as braided trouser seams). So I doubt that it was introduced to hide the "pot belly".
To my knowledge it has its origins in the adoption of tribal warrior "cummerbunds" by British military officers in South Asia. It then became part of civilian dinner suits (like other military uniform characteristics such as braided trouser seams). So I doubt that it was introduced to hide the "pot belly".
I know a cummerband is native to India. Indeed the warrior tribes used it as a belt to also keep daggers etc. near the waist. But I never understood why the English "made" it such a formal item in western wear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by unbelragazzo
My understanding is that it was adopted in those hotter climates because it doesn't wear as hot as a waistcoat.