• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Buying a Point-and-Shoot Camera: The Thread

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,710
Reaction score
9,853
I figure this must be a problem for lots of people. I have owned four or five digital point-and-shoots over the past fifteen years. With each subsequent camera, I convince myself the quality will be much better. There is a honeymoon period where I'm really happy with the output, but then I start to notice how flat, noisy, and lifeless the images are. In fact, I think my dinky Panasonic DMC-FX150 from five years ago is actually much worse than the Canon ELPH camera I had back in college ten years ago.

sony_rx_100.jpg


So, I hate looking for a new point-and-shoot. However, the Panasonic really is very bad (oh god, the noise!) and I ordered a replacement: the Sony RX100. By all accounts, it is a game changer amongst compacts. It has a large 1-inch sensor and f/1.8 Zeiss-branded lens. Reviews are calling it the best compact ever made, with near DSLR performance. Of course, I've heard that before.

My one comfort is that this time around, I'll only be relying on my point-and-shoot as a companion for my 35mm film rangefinder. So, the images don't need to be the absolute best--just not terrible.

Am I in for a disappointment nonetheless? We'll find out tomorrow.
 

BlackToothedGrin

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
99
Nice, let us know what you think. The price seems very reasonable for something that may get very close to micro 4/3 and may even surpass it when using only the kit lens. I bought the olympus xz-1 and wasn't impressed with it's low light capability at all, so I'm a little skeptical still, but sony has been pushing the envelope in mirrorless lately.
 

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,710
Reaction score
9,853
Yeah, the reviews for this thing are pretty glowing. A few have said it makes the entire low-end mirrorless category obsolete. The fast lens is real asset--but then, I guess your XZ-1 was also f/1.8. My hope is that combined with the large sensor, the results will really be paradigm-shifting.

Also, it shoots RAW. Now, if only Adobe would support the files in Lightroom . . .
 

b1os

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
9,847
Reaction score
1,654
It just won the EISA award for "Advanced Compact Camera", too.
Here's also a test setup in all ISO-settings, if that helps.
 
Last edited:

VaderDave

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
4,238
Reaction score
4,886
I have also heard and read really good reviews of the RX100. Are they available yet? Or did you preorder?

EDIT: I see you said "we'll find out tomorrow." I will tune in for your exhaustive review.
 
Last edited:

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
12,663
Reaction score
6,204
Looking forward to hearing more on this. I have been thinking about picking up a good quality point and shoot also, and have no idea where to start.
 

Rambo

Timed Out
Timed Out
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
24,706
Reaction score
1,347
The Canon S100 takes amazing photos and has a whole swath of features. Admittedly, I don't know how to use ANY of them, but the pics on auto are fantastic. Very compact and easy to operate as well.
 

b1os

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
9,847
Reaction score
1,654
Well, Rambro, we want to see those pictures (in case you used the Canon S100 on your trip and not, say, your bathroom).
 
Last edited:

momentoftruth

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
570
I also bought the RX100 just recently. I'm gonna take it on a trip next week with the Nex-5 so I'll be able to compare them. If performance is as good (or close enough) I'll be putting the Nex on ebay pretty quickly I think. Video mode also looks stellar (up to 1080p 60 fps), which is something that's important to me. Now if only iMovie dealt with AVCHD a little better...
 

GQgeek

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
84
you might look at an Olympus om-d. It's not a p&s but is micro 4/3 so it's still really small and has received glowing reviews.
 

Gerry Nelson

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
7,970
Reaction score
35,328
The Canon S100 takes amazing photos and has a whole swath of features. Admittedly, I don't know how to use ANY of them, but the pics on auto are fantastic. Very compact and easy to operate as well.

I've really like my S100. Admittedly I'm new to photography but the non-reblogged pics on my tumblr are taken with it and I'm really happy with how they've turned out. This is an example taken today:



These as well - http://gezzaseyes.tumblr.com/post/29957777178/state-library-of-victoria-melbourne-extremely
 
Last edited:

wetnose

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
996
Reaction score
6
If you guys are looking for a bargain, then the Olympus e-pl2 is a great bargain now - at about $300 on ebay.

Sensor is larger than RX100, and about 80% the size of an entry level DSLR. Serves up decent image quality for most pedestrian purposes (e.g. web albums, 4x6 prints, etc).

The kit lens is decent, but things start to get interesting (wide angle/telephoto) once you add lenses from the m43 line up. You can also attach almost *any* lens ever made via adapters easily available on ebay.
 

ter1413

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
22,101
Reaction score
6,033
Any more reviews??
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.9%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 37.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 39 16.3%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 37 15.4%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,797
Messages
10,592,021
Members
224,314
Latest member
Malcolm Carter
Top