or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Church's Consul - shape of toe box vs American makes of cap toe balmorals
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Church's Consul - shape of toe box vs American makes of cap toe balmorals

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 
I just received a pair of Church's Consuls by mail order and the shape of the toe box struck me in a way that it didn't when I tried them on in a Church's store. It appears a bit squarer (and makes the whole shoe look a bit longer) than several American makes of cap toe balmorals (Alden, Allen Edmonds, Johnston and Murphy Georgetowns). Not as exaggerated as C&J Hallam, which I didn't like and didn't fit me (Connaught didn't fit either).

My questions - is the Consul shape universally appropriate for business? And, is the shape likely to endure well for the long run (see: Kenneth Cole square toe shoes, admittedly a caricature to make the point). My primary use of them would be with suit and tie in a conservative work environment (finance), and perhaps sometimes with dress slacks (not ideal for balmorals I know). Maybe I'm just conditioned to a rounder/pointier shape by years of wearing American shoes.
post #2 of 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by electronicsjunkie View Post

My questions - is the Consul shape appropriate for business? My primary use of them would be with suit and tie in a conservative work environment (finance)

Yes. Stop over-thinking about it.

It is the 'go to' shoe in the Church's range, for a conservative business environment.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Church's Consul - shape of toe box vs American makes of cap toe balmorals