• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

MC General Chat

unbelragazzo

Jewfro
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
8,762
Reaction score
5,597

"Conceptually designed" is when you design for the aristoi, and "not conceptually designed" is when you design for the hoi polloi.


"Hoi polloiester?"

In all seriousness, I don't think designer fashion is less business-sensitive. It's just designed in a way that currently plugs into the conversation of concepts, forms, etc.

People making Costco dad jeans are just making whatever sells. They're not trying to sell you on an image, idea, concept, etc. Nor are they plugging into the bigger conversation on "fashion."

Do you not agree with that?


I do agree with that. I'm being unnecessarily stubborn mostly for sport. In practice, I agree that there's less thought going into Costco clothing than "fashion" clothing (except maybe current YSL). But I also think there's value to design even if something is mass-produced. Mass production adds another constraint to the design process, but that can make it more interesting.
 

dieworkwear

Mahatma Jawndi
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
27,320
Reaction score
69,987
Oh wait, I see what you guys mean. The @ symbol on top of this comment text box, right @LA Guy?
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,515
Reaction score
36,347
Oh wait, I see what you guys mean. The @ symbol on top of this comment text box, right @LA Guy ?
Congratulations. You can also just use the @ symbol if you are using the Rich Text editor. You can adjust that setting in your account settings.
 

bourbonbasted

Cyber Eliitist
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
4,243
Reaction score
2,344
Great stuff here, Derek. The only thing you've seemed to gloss over is the presence of rat fur in haute couture. However, I'm sure you'll cover that sooner than later...

It's taken quite some time for me to begin valuing design as much as (if not more than) "quality." I initially began questioning the value of "quality" when I realized that it means different things to different to different people. And, therefore, is objectively no different than design. You can easily identify **** quality just as you can easily identify **** design. However, when you begin digging deeper, there's no merit to always valuing one over the other, especially considering one's ability to judge either is completely subjective. Things then only become more complicated when you start blurring the lines of utility, art and luxury.
 

dieworkwear

Mahatma Jawndi
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
27,320
Reaction score
69,987
Honestly, I feel like quality is so often overrated. The aspects of quality I care about usually relate in some way to design - e.g. how canvassing might give a suit's lapels a fuller, three dimensional look, or how a higher stitch count can give something a more refined appearance. With the exception of maybe leather goods and knitwaer, most things I've owned haven't fallen apart. I have J Crew clothes from the 90s that are still perfectly intact. They just look as terrible now as they did back then.
 

dieworkwear

Mahatma Jawndi
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
27,320
Reaction score
69,987
No, it means I lost them. I packed them away for an apartment move, and since unpacking, haven't been able to find them. I put them in an envelope, I remember, but no longer remember where I put that envelope.

Very sad. I think I had something like fifty squares, which took me years to collect. Lots of pieces that aren't recoverable, because they're unusual designs, like some old stuff Drake's did for Flusser or mid-century designers I found at thrift stores.

I emailed The Armoury and Drake's to see which designs I might be able to recover. Drake's said only the stuff from last season is available. Going to send an email to Rubinacci to see what they say as well.

Kind of sucks.
 
Last edited:

JubeiSpiegel

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
5,405
Reaction score
1,041
You see no chance of finding said envelope? Maybe you will stumble upon it at your place at a later date. Can at least hope...
 

bourbonbasted

Cyber Eliitist
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
4,243
Reaction score
2,344
Luckily you only need to buy one, white linen square to make your collection complete again :D

Seriously though, that does suck.
 
Last edited:

dieworkwear

Mahatma Jawndi
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
27,320
Reaction score
69,987
Hey look, it's @Tirailleur1 at the 1 minute mark of this new United Arrows video

[VIDEO][/VIDEO]
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 23 10.2%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 16.0%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,391
Messages
10,588,926
Members
224,225
Latest member
Mystique Exhibitions
Top