or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › whnay.'s good taste thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

whnay.'s good taste thread - Page 348

post #5206 of 12602
very well then. here goes a repost, as i missed the new scoring system by a few posts.

post #5207 of 12602


They enhance everything...
post #5208 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHolliday View Post

To be honest I don't find those collars very flattering. They make a skinny neck look skinnier and a fat neck look fatter. It's hard to judge here but I urge caution.

Here's more from straight on, and with an idea of my neck dimensions. Personally I like this collar quite a bit.

post #5209 of 12602
colors look SO much better in this pic, unbel.
post #5210 of 12602
Yea that one is fairly accurate of the jacket, but the PS isn't so yellow and the tie is a little darker.
post #5211 of 12602
That's a really solid combo. Good job.
post #5212 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

very well then. here goes a repost, as i missed the new scoring system by a few posts.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


You know, the more of these foo.giffoo.gif-level outfits I'm forced to look at, the more tempted I will be to downgrade them a notch.

This is average in the office-working world. Nobody on the street is going to think you look bad, but no man who is well-dressed will mistake you for one of his own either. Why? Well, there is absolutely nothing to interest the eye. A good outfit has enough play in contrast, pattern, or color, etc., to make your eyes gently dance around it without getting stuck on something jarring. There is zero such dynamism here. The least you could have done is wear a somewhat lighter grey than charcoal, something between the brightness of your shirt and tie rather than something dead-on with the latter.

How bad is it to try so hard not to try? You know what, that costs you an extra foo.gif. This sort of outfit really doesn't belong on Styleforum.

Final score: foo.gif
post #5213 of 12602
I think you are ignoring what one can do with weave, texture, materials and so forth. I think style is also in the small details cut and fit. Beau Brummel if you will. Pattern matching has its place, but it doesn't have to be done all of the time for a great overall outfit.
post #5214 of 12602

This thread will be so much more interesting, now that an "old" member is here to judge again smile.gif

post #5215 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafoofan View Post

Okay, we need to get this thread back on track. I'm instituting a scoring system.
foo.giffoo.giffoo.gif: Unoffensive and technically correct, but nothing more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mafoofan View Post

Well, there is absolutely nothing to interest the eye. A good outfit has enough play in contrast, pattern, or color, etc., to make your eyes gently dance around it without getting stuck on something jarring.

How bad is it to try so hard not to try? You know what, that costs you an extra foo.gif. This sort of outfit really doesn't belong on Styleforum.

Final score: foo.gif

confused.gif
post #5216 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickBOOTH View Post

I think you are ignoring what one can do with weave, texture, materials and so forth. I think style is also in the small details cut and fit. Beau Brummel if you will. Pattern matching has its place, but it doesn't have to be done all of the time for a great overall outfit.

Of course, the proper use of texture plays a big role. I've talked about it at length in the past, haven't I? However, it is not one of the main errors Stitch made with his outfit.
post #5217 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crat View Post


confused.gif

Stitch's outfit is offensive, and it is not technically correct. It fails to properly deploy color, contrast, pattern, etc. A foo.giffoo.giffoo.gif outfit demonstrates solid taste, if not notably good taste. Stitch's commits the crime of hazarding no taste whatsoever.
post #5218 of 12602
Contrast, yes, but flannel, grenadine, and broadcloth? I think that's fine. Plus, the collar is nice, its under the lapels, there is proportion with the tie and lapels. What if he had a patterned square?
post #5219 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafoofan View Post

Stitch's outfit is offensive, and it is not technically correct. It fails to properly deploy color, contrast, pattern, etc. A foo.giffoo.giffoo.gif outfit demonstrates solid taste, if not notably good taste. Stitch's commits the crime of hazarding no taste whatsoever.


I think it's time to revisit an earlier suggestion--
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantabrigian View Post

2 suggestions--

Can we have separate categories for PT Williams (out of respect) and Stitches (to prevent meltdowns / bursts of 200 posts)?
post #5220 of 12602
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickBOOTH View Post

Contrast, yes, but flannel, grenadine, and broadcloth? I think that's fine. Plus, the collar is nice, its under the lapels, there is proportion with the tie and lapels. What if he had a patterned square?

What do you suppose he's achieved with that texture combination? It's not bad at all, but it is not enough to save the outfit. Yes, the collar shape is also fine. But the presence of some okay things doesn't compensate for errors and the total lack of anything good. A foo.giffoo.gif outfit is a mixed bag: some good, some bad. There is no good here, just okay.

It's hard to imagine a square that would save the outfit. When your square is the only thing you're wearing with a pattern, it sticks out like a sore thumb. Your pocket square is perhaps the last thing you want to draw disproportionate attention to itself. You're sort of stuck, then, with a solid square. What color wouldn't either look totally banal or totally random? I can't really imagine. Even cream silk would fail here. That, to me, really says something.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › whnay.'s good taste thread