• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

whnay.'s good taste thread

Loathing

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
669

poorsod

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Messages
4,263
Reaction score
970

I see this argument being used often, but is it so?
Really, I do not see them as a versatile shoe. They're, in my opinion, too contrived with suits, no matter how casual is the suit, and hence they're not that versatile. However, a single monk is quite the opposite, too sleek to be worn without a tailored jacket.
When I try to conceive a truly versatile shoe no configuration seems to fit the bill. Any ideas?


I don't find them contrived at all. I think you can wear them in place of loafers. In the US, loafers are seen worn with suits and jeans. I've been wearing the same pair of double monks for about 6-7 years, and only recently I'm hearing of the backlash. I don't get it.
 

CaymanS

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
802
Reaction score
75

I was unfortunate enough to buy a pair in black in 2010 and given the style, I can't wear them with formal suits, neither can I wear them casually, given the colour. Alas, they're expensive, still in a box at home, and unworn. They do look gorgeous, but not on my feet.

Maybe I should give them away.

705092

705093


Photos from Leather Soul.


I have a really, really radical idea. Ready? Here goes: take them out of your closet and wear them. *ducks*

705488
 

johnvw

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
875
Reaction score
58
I was unfortunate enough to buy a pair in black in 2010 and given the style, I can't wear them with formal suits, neither can I wear them casually, given the colour. Alas, they're expensive, still in a box at home, and unworn. They do look gorgeous, but not on my feet.

Maybe I should give them away.

705092

705093


Photos from Leather Soul.


I have a really, really radical idea. Ready? Here goes: take them out of your closet and wear them. *ducks*

705488


Or try to sell them. :hide:
 

CaymanS

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
802
Reaction score
75

Or try to sell them. :hide:


Agreed.

After whnay set the precedent, I think it's finally in 'good taste' to resell :D

Now if only Manton would do a closet clean.

It would shut the internet down for 48 straight hours at least.
 

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106

SF does not like dub munx = I am wearing mine tomorrow :slayer:


while i love the sentiment, i think it is still important to remember, that this thread =/= SF. some of the participants in this thread may hate double monks, but SF on a whole does not. i think that they can be both dandified, and perfectly elegant. its more dependent on how the wearer is using them, than the shoe itself, in most circumstances, imo.
 

comrade

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 10, 2005
Messages
8,981
Reaction score
2,271

I think it's pretty easy to identify the affected from the unaffected, and when something looks good and when it doesn't. Wearing a raincoat when it's not raining, nor likely to, for example, doesn't.


doesn't look affected or doesn't look good?
 

Pliny

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
3,900
Reaction score
8,177


affected? cmon, tell me this aint classy

my bad - forgot the
plain.gif
 
Last edited:

RDiaz

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2011
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
2,134
I doubt you'd fit them. I wear a UK 6.5.
A size 7 is usually slightly loose on me
dozingoff.gif


Anyways, in what context do you wear suits? For everyday office wear, I'd say you could use your dub monks without a problem - they are beautiful.
 
Last edited:

VictorSFreturn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
558
Reaction score
2,399
Let me explain my position
smile.gif


I love the style.
I do not like fashion


But the style is very different.

I like the English style, but I also like the modern Italian style (the version of it that without the strong influence of fashion).

I allow myself to dress differently, play and experiment.
I could dress in a simple, classic style every day and look for 1000000 $. But it's boring!


After all, a good recipe for business style is very simple and banal:

Take sewn to order a blue or gray suit, worsted cloth or flannel, no big relief.
Take a white or blue shirt is sewn to order (or purchased)
Take a dark tie (solid color, textured, with a small figure)
Take the dark shoes and a classic toe
Take a handkerchief in breast tone shirt with piping or small patterns in color suit or tie or shoes


All. Classic rigorously prepared.

If you take a good fabric and sewed all custom made or bought for quite a lot of money - that turned out very well.

But this incredibly boring and do not have to think! You only need to pay the money and not be color-blind.

Sometimes I dress like this, but not often, because, once again I'm interested in also other areas of style.

For me, style - it's not only the classics, as well as something at the intersection of classic and fashion. Where you can experiment, mix, think.

Provided that all done on the basis of the classics (strict style, English country style, American style of 20-30 years and 50-60 years, etc.)

In general I think is interesting to experiment, so that would be beautiful.

I'm not a slave to a strict business style. But I love it. Sometimes.
I just let myself love the great variety of styles. (Within good taste and based on the classics)


And that, I wish you all!
biggrin.gif
 
Last edited:

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,479
Messages
10,589,808
Members
224,252
Latest member
ColoradoLawyer
Top