STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
+1....actually...if you had any idea how much paperwork I am behind on you would choke.^ If you have any idea of how much paperwork I have you would choke.
Hey dudes.
Up and down week. Avoided a return through a tactful and polite response.
Only to find a message today that a priority package to San Fran that never got delivered. Difference is: tracking says it wasn't. 11 days later, priority package says location was in NJ.
So what do I do? Is there a # I can call? Obv. I will look on the USPS website, but would appreciate any similar experience.
(for ref, track # is 9405509699937142965884)
A family in each city to handle the local intake. Nice.
If it is possible, I would wait. There is a note somewhere on the USPS site that mentions deliveries can take up to 15 days no matter what service you are using. I have had this happen on 3 or 4 occasions. Its probably still out there somewhere. I would calmly try to explain this to the buyer and play it by ear. You have no control over the package delivery time, but if he is pissed you may do better to just deal with it now and hope he pays you back when it is delivered. (that actually happened to me once also)I need to quote myself here and ask for some advice.
After some sleuthing, I have determined the following:
1. The USPS has admitted they failed to properly track the package. Apparently, since the shipping was purchased online, the package showed "$0" paid for tracking, so the in-taking post office didn't flag it for full tracking. Terrifying to think how often THIS happens. Anyway, they say they "believe" it was delivered to its destination, but cannot provide proof. (Even worse: Their position is that "federal tort law" prohibits them for reimbursing me for anything other than the cost of the service that wasn't performed -- in this case, tracking. But since I paid $0 for tracking, I'm entitled to $0. I'm an effing lawyer and even I find this argument offensive!)
2. It gets worse. The "destination" in question was a college campus -- UCSF to be specific. UCSF centralizes mail delivery, so all packages are first received and processed by their central mail sort facility. So even if it had been properly tracked, all the tracking would have shown was delivery to the UCSF central mail facility, and nothing further.
3. And worse yet: UCSF doesn't track incoming packages, or require signature to pick up packages. So there is no record of it having been received by UCSF or delivered to the recipient's building.
4. But now for the worst part: The particular building I was shipping to is unique in the UCSF system in that the mailroom is an unsecured, shared space. (It's apparently a lab building where profs and grad students work; it's not a dorm or housing facility -- unless the dude was living in his office) That's right, anyone can wander in and grab their (or someone else's) mail. So even if EVERYTHING else had gone right, the package could have been nicked as soon as it arrived at my buyer's mail cubby.
The item cost me $85. Add $10 shipping, and my total at risk amount is $95, and that's not counting the ~$40 in profit I had on the item. Clearly Ebay is going to side with the buyer on this one. So my gut tells me I should just proactively refund him.
My only question to you dudes is: Given that the buyer knowingly shipped to an unsecure mailroom (as opposed to his house, for example), should I ask him to share some portion of my at risk amount? Or is that just setting myself up for bad feedback and an SNAD case? One thing you should know: The buyer has already sent a snarky message saying he had bought the item for an "event" that has already passed, and that he's annoyed. So we're already on shaky ground.
Oh wait...I see now it has been over 17 days. I was thinking it had only been 11.Ohh didn't realize the short time frame. I would definitely hold off on the refund, not like it was a $3 Thrifted shirt.
If it is possible, I would wait. [/URL]
Ohh didn't realize the short time frame.
Are they taking the stance that it's delivered? The only thing they have to back them is delivery confirmation and that's obviously not working. In my experience, the postal employees will always initially take the stance of "probably delivered" just to get you to go away
It just says, "We have determined that the buyer should return the item to you for a full refund." I asked him to return it anyway, the only difference was the 10% restocking fee ($4.25). I assume it was closed in neither of our favors. I wanted a 10% restocking fee and he wanted me to pay the return shipping. So I guess you could call it a draw. Now I just have to see if he actually returns the tux or if he sticks something else in the box.Was rooting for youbut not surprised. They actually ruled "not as described" rather than just forcing the return (that you already offered)? You should call and ask them to explain the decision if for nothing but a laugh while the phone rep squirm trying to defend such lunacy.
Yes, and yes. I asked for a supervisor. I was told "I will try to get someone to call you back, but no guarantees." I said that was outrageous. But what the hell am I going to do?