Oops. Fixed that..lol.
I could send it to them, and try for the last 15 bucks just to screw him, but it is not really worth the shipping cost to do that. Either way, He is out $38 and has no vintage suit to show for it. I actually made a very small profit. He should have taken the return with the $4.54 restocking fee, but hey...if he wants to learn the hard way, I am happy to teach him.
Just out of curiosity, I googled the buyers name to see who I was dealing with. Turns out he is a 50 year old dude in NY. He has a trademark on record for some recording equipment, which is yet to be developed. I had the opportunity to leave the first review, but I decided not to at this time.
I was thinking maybe something like this.
"The product is not what I expected. It is not worth the expense I paid or the time I spent. I get better recording results from my vintage equipment at home."











I was under the impression -1 was the lowest. Conceivably you could write something about it in your auction terms, but that hardly seems enforceable.
![lurker[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/lurker%5B1%5D.gif)
![shog[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/shog%5B1%5D.gif)
![peepwall[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/peepwall%5B1%5D.gif)
