or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Shoe Fit: Brannock Device vs Your real world size.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shoe Fit: Brannock Device vs Your real world size.

post #1 of 16
Thread Starter 
After a looong time I got measured at the AE store today on the brannock. L- 10D R- 11D

AE- 11.5D, except Strand in 11D.
Peal- 11.5D
RL- (C&J , EG) 11.5D
EG- 10.5/11 E 202, 11/11.5 D 888, 82
Lobb- 10.5E UK 7000/8000, except William feels way bigger in 10.5E UK.
G&G- 11E UK
Berluti- 11.5D US
AS- 10.5F UK
Alden- 11.5D Plaza, 11.5D in Barrie is way too big.
Suzuki- I wish....shog[1].gif

So it seems the *Device* is no where near my personal comfortable shoe sizes, which i don't wear too snug, I like toe wiggle room. My left foot is smaller as I expected, but a whole size was unexpected. Trying different widths and sizes was great in a real store, but sadly wont carry over to other shoe makers/lasts.

Whats your experience with device vs real world size?

Regards.
Edited by Shikar - 7/26/12 at 12:24pm
post #2 of 16
Similar experience here. According to the Brannock and the people operating it I always cone out at 8.5 D with my left foot slightly bigger than the right. However, based on my subjective sense of comfort I have rarely found a US 8.5 or equivalent to fit.

AE 9D in all lasts that I have tried
EG 82 last 8.5/9E
JL 8E
Vass U last 42.5
Vass F last 42
Barker Black 8E
RM Williams 8
St. Crispin's 8.5F UK equivalent (can't remember the Euro size; 42 I think).

There are no objective signs of my shoes being too big such as abnormal creasing or gaps at the ankle.

Does this have to do with how tight a fit one likes's?
post #3 of 16

My feet are the same size.  Heel to toe on the Brannock, I am an 11C.  Heel to ball, I am an 11.5B/C.

 

AE #5 11.5B

AE #7 11C

Alden Leydon/Hampton/Plaza 11.5B

Alden Barrie/Trubalance 10.5D

Alden Modified 11C


Edited by PhiPsi32 - 7/26/12 at 7:07pm
post #4 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsugsu View Post

Similar experience here. According to the Brannock and the people operating it I always cone out at 8.5 D with my left foot slightly bigger than the right. However, based on my subjective sense of comfort I have rarely found a US 8.5 or equivalent to fit.
AE 9D in all lasts that I have tried
EG 82 last 8.5/9E
JL 8E
Vass U last 42.5
Vass F last 42
Barker Black 8E
RM Williams 8
St. Crispin's 8.5F UK equivalent (can't remember the Euro size; 42 I think).
There are no objective signs of my shoes being too big such as abnormal creasing or gaps at the ankle.
Does this have to do with how tight a fit one likes's?

What is the arch measurement on the brannock? And have you had your feet measured a number of times late in the day?

 

And you have every brand of shoe that you mentioned above?

post #5 of 16
Yes
post #6 of 16
I've had my feet measured at various times of the day including late in the day. The result is always 8.5D. My left foot is slightly longer than my right but still short of 9. I have a narrow heel and slippage is sometimes a problem. Heel fit is best with a pair of Barker Black Archdale's.. My JL Beckett's are the worst in this respect.
post #7 of 16
There are a number of reasons for these differences.

First, it's also the fault of the buyer: When one pick a pair of shoes, first, one thereby pre-select the last. Chances are there's almost always a mismatch between foot shape and last shape. That needs to be corrected by selecting different sizes and widths, and, consequently, you'll end up with sizes all over the place.

But Brannock has it's problem, too, in my opinion.

First, for the arch length "feature" to work, the devise needs to assume a fixed ratio between foot length and arch lenght. But why should any shoe maker use the same ratio?

Second, width is relative to the last. A "D" just means the "initial" ball girth of the last, and that can be almost anything. The Barrie last in D is much wider than, say AE's 5-65 last. Brannock cannot account for these differences.

Finally, devise makers such a Brannock appear to use a nominal allowance of 2 full units (UK or US), while most people wear shoes with 1.5 units – at least, according to my data. In other words, even Brannock's length measurement appears to be half a size too long, in general.
post #8 of 16
^ which is why I have never followed the Brannock but rather experimented with which particular last fits best within one maker's range of products and across all makers. As an example, with Vass the F last fits me better than the U even after figuring out my correct size in each respective last.
post #9 of 16

Anyone else wish to disclose their Brannock size vs. actual shoe size?  We can start an ancillary thread for discussion of specific cases.

post #10 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsugsu View Post

Yes

Yes  what? You  had your foot measured numerous times by a pro or you purchased every one of those shoes New and in the maker's shop and not off ebay or used which would make you size calculations void?

post #11 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsugsu View Post

^ which is why I have never followed the Brannock but rather experimented with which particular last fits best within one maker's range of products and across all makers. As an example, with Vass the F last fits me better than the U even after figuring out my correct size in each respective last.

Let's leave out these fringe shoes from Eastern Europe and their sizing. No one wears Vass or cares about their sizing. We talking about US and UK makers and the brannock devices calibrated for each country.  You could probably also include a lot of Italian, Spanish etc shoes in the same category  because they sell a lot in  countries that use the brannock sizing and they make their shoes to correspond to that.

post #12 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claus View Post

There are a number of reasons for these differences.
First, it's also the fault of the buyer: When one pick a pair of shoes, first, one thereby pre-select the last. Chances are there's almost always a mismatch between foot shape and last shape. That needs to be corrected by selecting different sizes and widths, and, consequently, you'll end up with sizes all over the place.
But Brannock has it's problem, too, in my opinion.
First, for the arch length "feature" to work, the devise needs to assume a fixed ratio between foot length and arch lenght. But why should any shoe maker use the same ratio?
Second, width is relative to the last. A "D" just means the "initial" ball girth of the last, and that can be almost anything. The Barrie last in D is much wider than, say AE's 5-65 last. Brannock cannot account for these differences.
Finally, devise makers such a Brannock appear to use a nominal allowance of 2 full units (UK or US), while most people wear shoes with 1.5 units – at least, according to my data. In other words, even Brannock's length measurement appears to be half a size too long, in general.

You're just plain wrong. Width is relative to size not last. But  all of this talk is superfluous because 9 out of 10 noobs here can't even get their size and width right.

post #13 of 16
Thanks for the questions and I realize I should have been more clear. Yes, the shoes were all new save for the Barker Black's which were lightly used and purchased from a SF member. Most were purchased in bricks and mortar establishments so I could establish my size for a particular brand and a particular last. Once I have my size pinned down I will order online from an authorized dealer. The Vass U last were purchased new from Vass via a SF member. I suppose i took a flyer on sizing based on reading the Vass thread(s) and asking questions of various members with a great deal of experience with Vass. I've never purchased shoes on EBay.

So yes, I have had my feet measured by professionals numerous times and despite the 8.5D Brannock measurement I feel more comfortable in a 9D US or equivalent. Maybe I am wrong basing my choices on my subjective feelings of how the shoes fit but I have to wear them and I have no regrets.
post #14 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsugsu View Post

Maybe I am wrong basing my choices on my subjective feelings of how the shoes fit but I have to wear them and I have no regrets.

Your choice may not be purely based on subjective feelings about shoe fit.

It's very common for men with an absolute small foot length to have above-average width and girth measurements, ie. a relatively wider and higher foot shape. At least, according to my data.

Since most lasts are not made for such foot shapes (or they are unknown to buyers), such people tend to size up from their reference size. I have the same, well, "problem".

Strictly speaking, though, your shoes are probably 1/3 inch (about 8.5mm) longer than recommended, provided your Brannock size is based on foot length.
post #15 of 16
^But only provided that the lasts he chooses are of the same proportion as his feet.

350x263px-LL-de48734f_900x900px-LL-09c5525b_P5312698.jpeg

Consider the large number of sizing issues on the Vass U last, and the various rules of thumb of sizing up and down on that last (darker tree above, lighter is EG888). These largely stem from the high, forward positioning of the instep, and the low volume, narrow toe box - i.e. you need a high arch and small toes to fit it well. Most people don't have this combination, so they size up if they have a high arch and large toes, or down if they have a lower arch and small toes (this would be me: normal arch, small toes, US9B on the Brannock, 41 on the U last). Those with normal or low arches and large toes or wide feet have experienced much disappointment because of this.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Shoe Fit: Brannock Device vs Your real world size.