This morning a perfectly attractive young woman (pretty, even for nyc, stylishly attired in a nice dress) got on the subway. When the car thinned out a little at the next stop I could see that her long legs were covered w/ tattoos. Not hipster-type sleeves (leggings: /confused:), but individual tattoos, semi-evenly spaced out w/ 2-3 inches of empty skin surrounding each tat. They appeared to be random subjects (i/e/ not related as part of some overall pattern), although I didn't get a good look at what they were - they seemed to be all different things, but the sizing was roughly the same for each image. They began at ther ankles covered her legs on all sides until they disappeared under her (fairly short) skirt. No visible tats any where else. She didn't look like a hipster/doper/hooker, etc.

, right?