Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Entertainment and Culture › Rank the films with 200mil+ budgets
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rank the films with 200mil+ budgets - Page 2

post #16 of 21
6/6/12 at 2:59am
Of those films, I've only seen Titanic. peepwall[1].gif
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 21
6/6/12 at 5:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post


Those I have seen:

The suck
Avatar 2009 $237*
Quantum of Solace 2008 $200

Here. Dunno what is the point considering that while many people watch these films I doubt many, including retards, think they're amazing or their favourite. I mean I watched Mission impossible 4 yesterday and it's not like I was expecting something good or was saddened by the level of mediocrity it reached.
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 21
6/6/12 at 10:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuuma View Post

Here. Dunno what is the point considering that while many people watch these films I doubt many, including retards, think they're amazing or their favourite. I mean I watched Mission impossible 4 yesterday and it's not like I was expecting something good or was saddened by the level of mediocrity it reached.

This is, sadly, how i go into most movies now-a-days.
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 21
6/6/12 at 1:33pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuuma View Post

Here. Dunno what is the point considering that while many people watch these films I doubt many, including retards, think they're amazing or their favourite. I mean I watched Mission impossible 4 yesterday and it's not like I was expecting something good or was saddened by the level of mediocrity it reached.

How did you see Avatar? The storytelling and acting are middling at best, but in 3D, on the big screen, it's visually amazing.
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 21
6/6/12 at 1:35pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post

How did you see Avatar? The storytelling and acting are middling at best, but in 3D, on the big screen, it's visually amazing.

I saw it in 3D and thought it was about 20 minutes too long. It seemed liked they just added extra crap in for the 3D visuals rather than adding stuff in for the plot.
Reply
Reply
post #21 of 21
6/6/12 at 2:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texasmade View Post

I saw it in 3D and thought it was about 20 minutes too long. It seemed liked they just added extra crap in for the 3D visuals rather than adding stuff in for the plot.

Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Entertainment and Culture › Rank the films with 200mil+ budgets