Quote:
Originally Posted by
RSS 
Per Hober, all the files/designs were transferred.
As the Macclesfield printers went out of business the designs either were sold or in many cases given away to two local museums.
So currently most of the old designs are available - some actually in the David Evans/Adamley files, some in museums and some in other corporate collections such as Silk Industries which owns Vanners the weavers and used to own David Evans and Adamley.
David Evans/Adamley is now independently owned and operated by its management.
Some printers in Italy (and perhaps other countries) are licensing the old designs from the museums. This is not making the few remaining Macclesfield printers happy...
In regards to the opening post of this thread i would divide pocket square quality into:
Fabric, construction, printing/weaving and design.
Hermes is a master at design and printing with good construction and fabric.
Simonnot-Godard has wonderful fabrics and good construction
Most other top makers have beautiful designs, very nice fabrics and good construction.
Our Sam Hober pocket squares have good designs as well as beautiful fabrics like Simonnot-Godard's; but our construction is our claim to fame as our experts spend 2+ hours per pocket square. The big names typically sew the edges of their squares very quickly for a rustic look - with a few exceptions.
So in the end value is determined by a combination of fabric, design, construction and printing/weaving.
If I thought there was enough demand I would print the old classics again and make pocket squares and then keep them in stock forever.