STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
They maybe classic in style and not 'fashion forward' and thus not attract younger buyers but that is neither bad nor a reflection upon their products or intent. They may also be in a price range that younger less well paid people deem excessive for shoes.
I agree, that's what comes to mind for me. But if you can wear it with confidence, then go for it.Not to rain on your parade, but out of all "zapatos de viejo" (old man shoes) styles, "zapatos de rejilla" (woven shoes) like those are considered the pinnacle of geriatric footwear around these parts...
Not to rain on your parade, but out of all "zapatos de viejo" (old man shoes) styles, "zapatos de rejilla" (woven shoes) like those are considered the pinnacle of geriatric footwear around these parts...
Well then... I'm certainly glad that my parts are nowhere near yours.
I've worn them 3 times since I got them for fathers day (twice to church, once to a local concert) and I have received dozens of complements on them already (none of those complements coming from a person over the age of 30).
Stop worrying so much about what everyone else is wearing and wear what you believe to be beautiful.
To a large degree, I agree with this, but those previously mentioned brands generally cost quite a bit more. That's where AE makes it's name.I dont like them at all. for every "classic" style they do Crockett and Jones, Lobb, Edward Green or Cleverley execute it much, much better.