or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Mark of an inferior shoe? (Toe spring or no?)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Mark of an inferior shoe? (Toe spring or no?)

post #1 of 34
Thread Starter 
I took my new C&J Westbournes to the local cobbler last week just to see if I could find a good color match in shoe polish. The cobbler admired the shoes, asked how much I paid for them, and then plopped one down on his counter so that he could eyeball it from the side.

"See that gap under the sole?" he asked, as he pushed down on the back of shoe. "A really good pair of shoes doesn't do that. Really good shoes lay flat. My father taught me that."

Here's the shoe at rest. Notice that the heel isn't flat against the counter.
Down.jpg


Here I'm pressing the heel flat against the counter, and that's raising the sole nearly a quarter of an inch.
Up.jpg


And here's a closeup of the heel, which I believe is showing unusual signs of wear considering that I've only worn the shoes five times since they arrived:
Heel.jpg


So is the cobbler right or is he full of crap? And what about the wear on the heel? Did I get a pair of lemons?
post #2 of 34
cloud.gif

lurker[1].gif
post #3 of 34
Your cobbler's making a ton of sense. I'd say we obsess too much on SF, but you also paid a significant chunk of change for those shoes no doubt. They should rest flat. That's like the new eyeball test, right!
post #4 of 34
Of my shoes, my pair of Bexleys suffers from this issue as well. And I thought it is due to Bexley being inferior in quality compare to my S.Mants, Cheneys and Herrings. I don't know whether it actually affects longevity of the shoe in any way, but it certainly feels like it does for when I stand on solid, level ground it seems stress is being added to the waist of the shoe and I can actually feel it to be slightly awkward under my feet.
post #5 of 34
Interesting, the AEs I have have the same amount of tilt. My AE Seven collection shoes have a sliver of space, same as my Ferragamos. I'm sure wear has something to do with this, but since your shoes are new, it is an interesting theory...
post #6 of 34
The mark of an inferior shoe is the inferior man who wears it.
post #7 of 34
post #8 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by srivats View Post

TB, take a look at this thread:
http://new.styleforum.net/t/69958/proper-heel-height

Your cobbler is mistaken.

See my post....#83....in the thread that Sri linked to above.
post #9 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by srivats View Post

TB, take a look at this thread:
http://new.styleforum.net/t/69958/proper-heel-height
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWFII View Post

Your cobbler is mistaken.
See my post....#83....in the thread that Sri linked to above.

Thank you very much, gentlemen. It took hat thread a long time to get to the point, but it really paid off in the end. Much appreciated.
post #10 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWFII View Post


Your cobbler is mistaken.
See my post....#83....in the thread that Sri linked to above.

DWFII,

I read your post in the thread, but am still uncertain: is it necessarily detrimental to have heels that do not fully contact the ground?

 

Shoes with heels that do not contact the floor are likely to be made while the last is not in the shoe until the very last step; you're dismayed when you see heels that display the above condition. Yet you say that the cobbler is wrong in that good shoes must have heels that completely contact every square cm of its surface area. Can you clarify for me?
 

 

post #11 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threadbearer View Post

Thank you very much, gentlemen. It took hat thread a long time to get to the point, but it really paid off in the end. Much appreciated.

That's our hope for this thread.
post #12 of 34
How does the heel sit as you are wearing the shoes?
post #13 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threadbearer View Post

I took my new C&J Westbournes to the local cobbler last week just to see if I could find a good color match in shoe polish. The cobbler admired the shoes, asked how much I paid for them, and then plopped one down on his counter so that he could eyeball it from the side.
"See that gap under the sole?" he asked, as he pushed down on the back of shoe. "A really good pair of shoes doesn't do that. Really good shoes lay flat. My father taught me that."
Here's the shoe at rest. Notice that the heel isn't flat against the counter.
Down.jpg
Here I'm pressing the heel flat against the counter, and that's raising the sole nearly a quarter of an inch.
Cobbler is wrong about sole laying flat,
it have no spring.
Shoe sole above should not be so far off ground at end.
Good way is for toe to raise off ground one pencil width high.
Me not sure about heel,
many many man say many many different thing.
post #14 of 34
I love these kind of folk wisdom things.

Someday, in the near future, we will cry how science has mad all of it obsolete.
post #15 of 34
Double sole is different from single sole.
Double sole need more raise at end of sole for spring so man can rock back and front.
lf it not,
man walk in thick shoe with no flex and walk like river monster.
lt need to rock.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Mark of an inferior shoe? (Toe spring or no?)