Quote:
Originally Posted by
sugarbutch 
i took the ferry from the proposed site. It's a flippin' cliff, so the elevation change will be nice.
I hated the Letterman interview. He should have shut the f*** up and let Vettel talk. As became plain when he did, Vettel didn't need any help to be entertaining. Plus, who the f*** cares about Indiana?
My old apartment was 5min walk from the ferry... right of River rd.
Pretty nice stretch that road. That would be a 100% attendance for me! Texas plane tickets are more expensive than I'd care to pay, not to mention the shafting you'll get when you book a hotel room
![shog[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/shog%5B1%5D.gif)
Oh and for the understeer/oversteer comment - I drive like Hammy, my views are biased

The only time I set my car/karts up for understeer is if I'm very new to the track, my first time out(when I have time), or both - it's the safer way around for me. With understeer, I have to completely adjust my braking/cornering habits just to set up the kart around the corner.
Aside from textbook definitions between the two, I do find that a driver that prefers an understeering kart has a better feel for grip. They sense grip relatively better at the track, therefore a smoother drive, and lasting tires. I, and a few others who prefer an oversteering kart, use our slip angles to scrub speed off around the corner, neutralizing the tires much faster - think "
fast in, fast out"
So, for a race that relies heavily on tire life, a well-balanced, understeer-biased kart would be most efficient
(of course not taking into account driver input). Think Button in BrawnGP. It was essentially the perfect car for him. Except for the tracks that killed tires much faster, his races were phenomenal.
*I'm missing a huge chunk of info somewhere there but it's the best I can explain for now
*