Everlane T-shirts - Page 168
Styleforum Top Picks
For me, the real kicker is the fit, but not for the reasons people have commented on regarding the model pics. The hip flare is not bad at all on me; in fact, it fits quite well in the body. The problem for me, rather, is in the shoulders. The measurements indicated for a medium are 18.25'', which is in the realm of wearability for me, but it seems mine actually measure more like 18.75''. My shoulders are already on the narrow side, so that's enough of a difference so the whole fit just looks off on me. Furthermore, the sleeves on the blue oxford are a good bit longer than the ones on the white oxford.
Just received white Oxford in small. Not sure why custserv rep described the fit as "aggressively slim" and comparable to gitman vintage. Fits ok in the shoulders and chest, but flares out at bottom. Too long to wear untucked, poofs out when tucked in (31 true waist). It's going back.
Well for most customers it is aggressively slim. A M in a mall brand will be huge compared to a M in Gitman.
Depends how you are built, Gitman sleeves are actually a bit tight on me, and armholes could barely be any higher, chest and collar right on
I just got my smoke and blue everlane oxfords, and I'm disappointed with the sizing.
I wear a size small in Everlane t-shirts and wear a size XS to small in button downs depending on the brand. I choose to order a size small in the oxford based on Nan saying they're aggressive slim. The oxford was too big on me and too long to be worn untucked. I'm disappointed because I was really excited about Everlane's oxfords, but based on the sizing I'm not sure if even a XS would be short enough to wear untucked. Before anyone says I must be really short and skinny, I'm 5'11 and a little under 165lbs.
Overall the quality is what I expected for the price, but I'm not sure I would purchase them again since I'm afraid of Everlane constant sizing changes that it's hard to be sure if all be a small or extra small in the next run from China.