I know you're just trolling but... there are many RP supporters who actually believe what you typed. And I'm not sure where it is coming from. W managed to win twice without any particular Ron Paul/libertarian backing so clearly, it can be done.
But on top of that, you're just too small a percentage to matter, sorry.
In 1988 Ron Paul had .5% of the vote in the general.
In 2008 Ron Paul had .8% percent of the delegates and 1.6% of the vote in the primary.
After four years of organizing and campaigning and outreach he is at a whopping 11.4% of the vote (with an even smaller share of the vote when its all said and done, guaranteed), 75% less than Mitt, and fewer victories than Newt. But, yeah, hey, sure, you're going to decide the general when you can't even win a single state in the primary and the only time you come close is when 50% of the candidates decide to not even contest the race. Whatever you have to tell yourself is fine.