Quote:
Originally Posted by KJT 
It's really not that expensive. You'd have to vacuum seal an awful lot of food to make up the $450 difference in price between that vp112 and the newest foodsaver. 20ft of foodsaver bags is $24 on amazon. I mean, it doesn't make sense to vacuum seal half an avocado like they do in the ads, but for meats purchased in bulk and stuff, it makes sense.

It's really not that expensive. You'd have to vacuum seal an awful lot of food to make up the $450 difference in price between that vp112 and the newest foodsaver. 20ft of foodsaver bags is $24 on amazon. I mean, it doesn't make sense to vacuum seal half an avocado like they do in the ads, but for meats purchased in bulk and stuff, it makes sense.
20ft is really not a lot for someone that is going to sous-vide a lot, buy entire tenderloins, etc. That's like 83 cents a bag. Very expensive. If you have a chamber sealer you pay more like 10 cents a bag which is a hell of a lot more reasonable.You break-even somewhere aroond the 550 bag mark.
And check the food saver reviews on amazon. There are tons of reports of them breaking and needing to be replaced. And they still don't suck enough air to prevent freezer burn in a lot of cases and are sucky for liquids. Over a shorter period, fine, but longer? There are probably hundreds of reports of them not doing the job.
Believe me, I understand the impulse to buy a cheaper device because it's really not a priority for most people in life, but I just don't think it's cheaper even in the medium term, let alone the long term.















