Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Quality ladies footwear
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Quality ladies footwear

post #1 of 30
Thread Starter 
All this time I have this very simplistic assumption that historically, men's shoes were such because they were working shoes; basically the construction method was invented and perfected to serve for a strong, protective, and replaceable piece or footwear. And women shoes were traditionally either clogs/ slippers for household or domestic duty or, straight at the other end of the spectrum, vanity shoes (heels et al.).

Judging by the nature of shoe purchasing behaviour of my young female acquaintances I would still say that their inner view of footwear still oscillates between those two: hence I saw them buying crocs slippers because it's comfy for casual use (not the clog looking ones, thankfully- if you know which one I'm referring to), flats, OR vanity heels which hurt their feet after 5 hours and last only for 6 months.

Now, I found out that, well, apparently I was wrong: there are actually ladies footwear constructed akin to ours, as can be seen here:

http://www.johnlobbltd.co.uk/catalogue/fullsize_images/Website_shoes_boots/Websiteshoes/Ladiesshoes/ladiesshoesthumb.htm

If there are any well-informed fellow members able to fill in my knowledge regarding the history of such footwear I would be really happy. It has been my concern because of, well, my female friends, they are simply not getting the best for their feet and I am curious as to why. In my opinion, in this time when our female counterparts are rising to the workforce it would also be a good time to embrace a more- for lack of a better word- proper footwear.

Are there other makers who produces such footwear besides the 2000 poundsterling John Lobb? With pricing similar to Loake or Herringshoes, or offering AE-type of value (which, I think, would be a very good introduction)? Are ladies' shoes such as these a long gone tradition, or do they still exist out there but not in RTW?

Pardon my naivety; I am driven by honest curiosity. Feel free to correct.
post #2 of 30

Thanks for posting this. I don't have a clue if there are any shoemakers other than the ones you mentioned. I'm a girl and I started following this forum looking for women's shoes of qualities at par with Allen Edmonds, Alden, etc.

To be honest, those women's Lobbs don't look as nice as the men's. Let alone the varieties. Maybe I've already been brainwashed by this forum..

 

post #3 of 30
Check out Carmina, my wife has a pair she loves:
http://www.carminashoemaker.com/web/muj/coleccion.php?lang=eng&dist=h
I think C&J makes for women as well.
post #4 of 30
179179

mwink[1].gif
post #5 of 30

Ah.. what a pain to order online internationally. Which model does your wife own? What is the fit like?

 

I like Carminas but I don't see a model that I want. I'm looking for a rounded cap toe oxford.. like the Forest model in mens or this Robert:

 

tumblr_lkxdbtMsxj1qad1ef

I would order mens shoes if it weren't for my cursed small feet. 

 

I've been eyeing these Gucci brogues on Net-A-Porter for some time now.. 

164579_in_dl.jpg164579_fr_dl.jpg

 

The shape of these are perfect and I'm obviously drawn to the color but are these worth buying??

 

 

post #6 of 30
Many companies make well constructed footwear for women, including SF-familiar names such as C&J, Grenson, Carmina. However, special orders maybe needed.

Keep in mind that there is a huge difference between the two worlds. Your (male) views on quality footwear can be totally irrelevant.
post #7 of 30
ugh, you guys can do what you want, but I'll have my girl stick with those disposable heels.
post #8 of 30
My wife has these: http://www.carmina.telemaco.es/articulo.asp?idarticulo=3476674 but in tan calf. She loves the fit and finds them comfortable.
post #9 of 30
Differences in teh ladies from us regarding shoes:

There are much fewer basic styles of shoe for men. 5 or 6 pairs and we usually have them all covered whereas;
Ladies fashion changes constantly and many of them desire to follow the trend.
Ladies usually amass a far greater quantity of footwear lending to individual pairs being used less frequently.
Ladies like to coordinate so the basic colors usually just don't cut it.
This extends to handbags, belts, etc.
Ladies want their feet to appear a small and dainty as possible, so most time tested methods of creating a long-lasting shoe leads to a thicker sole whereas a glued sole can be paper thin.
Ladies enjoy the shopping aspect and constantly need to add on to their footwear repertoire.

Let me know if you need more.
post #10 of 30

more, please.

post #11 of 30

Shit... I'm a man and i think the pair of laced ups suede titled "hills" looks awesome.... shog[1].gif
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by KObalto View Post

Check out Carmina, my wife has a pair she loves:
http://www.carminashoemaker.com/web/muj/coleccion.php?lang=eng&dist=h
I think C&J makes for women as well.


 

post #12 of 30
Zee's can do ladies shoes. An example:
263 263
post #13 of 30
uhoh.gif
post #14 of 30
Best bet for this kind of inquiry is a small but relatively comprehensive overview of shoe history...encompassing both men's and women's shoe evolutions and fashion. I recommend Shoes by Dame June Swann, B.T. Batsford, Ltd., London, 1982, ISBN 0 7134 0942 8, covering the 17th through the mid 20th century.
post #15 of 30
Here's the exact model I bought my wife (although I borrowed the photo from banis, who bought his wife a pair as well):

197
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Men's Clothing
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Quality ladies footwear