Judging by the nature of shoe purchasing behaviour of my young female acquaintances I would still say that their inner view of footwear still oscillates between those two: hence I saw them buying crocs slippers because it's comfy for casual use (not the clog looking ones, thankfully- if you know which one I'm referring to), flats, OR vanity heels which hurt their feet after 5 hours and last only for 6 months.
Now, I found out that, well, apparently I was wrong: there are actually ladies footwear constructed akin to ours, as can be seen here:
http://www.johnlobbltd.co.uk/catalogue/fullsize_images/Website_shoes_boots/Websiteshoes/Ladiesshoes/ladiesshoesthumb.htm
If there are any well-informed fellow members able to fill in my knowledge regarding the history of such footwear I would be really happy. It has been my concern because of, well, my female friends, they are simply not getting the best for their feet and I am curious as to why. In my opinion, in this time when our female counterparts are rising to the workforce it would also be a good time to embrace a more- for lack of a better word- proper footwear.
Are there other makers who produces such footwear besides the 2000 poundsterling John Lobb? With pricing similar to Loake or Herringshoes, or offering AE-type of value (which, I think, would be a very good introduction)? Are ladies' shoes such as these a long gone tradition, or do they still exist out there but not in RTW?
Pardon my naivety; I am driven by honest curiosity. Feel free to correct.







![mwink[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/mwink%5B1%5D.gif)





![shog[1].gif](http://files.styleforum.net/images/smilies/shog%5B1%5D.gif)




