Quote:
Originally Posted by
Van Veen 
Yup. I also find that women don't understand classic menswear like the proportions of a suit. (Yet some of these are the same women who say, "why can't men dress like real men anymore, like Cary Grant or Fred Astaire?") e.g., slightly dramatized discussion from my life: "I hate pleated pants, you should never wear pleated pants" ... "well, if they're part of the suit, and I'm never going to wear them without the jacket, so shouldn't it only matter how they look with the jacket?" ... "no, pleated pants are out of style you should never wear them" ... "but if I wear flat front pants, they inevitably fall down to my hips and it makes it look I am busting a sag" ... "but you don't want high waisted pants because you'll look like an old man" ... "since it's a tux, I'll have a vest or cummerbund on so no one will see the waist" ... "oh come on vests and cummerbunds are out of style!" etc. etc. etc.
You get a lot of points for trying to explain each of these points. You get a lot of bonus points if you actually used the phrase "bust a sag".
However, FWIW, I wear flats with my tux and they sit just above my hip. Really doesn't matter much if you wear a cummerbund, IMO, and for someone like me (disproportionately legs) a cummerbund above a high-waisted trouser would look silly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
culverwood 
A loafer yes but more refined than a penny one. Just the thing for black tie.
Well, not a penny as we think of it, but if you look closely at the the more visible of the two shoes you can clearly see a band across it with a cutout, much like a penny loafer...
His jacket would also appear to be a size too big, hence the shoulder pads sticking off the end of his shoulders.