That looks like the very particular color of pyrope garnet -- is that what they are? I think they are beautiful, though a bold departure. I probably wouldn't wear them without matching links, honestly. Might seem like the links had gone missing....
Interesting. It's purposeful for me. I really don't like the idea of everything matching.
I assumed it was purposeful. I admit to liking them less in role; however. Perhaps I too am distracted by the boldness of the outfit overall -- the flower, I suppose, was on account of the occasion?
I'd never wear a flower to a wedding these days unless in the wedding party and instructed. Whether we like it or not, it is a signifier of things and I don't want to break protocol.
I'd never wear a flower to a wedding these days unless in the wedding party and instructed. Whether we like it or not, it is a signifier of things and I don't want to break protocol.
After the ceremony I pluck one from the ceremony arrangements or from the table centerpieces. I am sure that is bad taste, but no one has ever stopped me or complained (to my face).
Oh, I'd say it depends on the type and size of the flower. Having a tiny cornflower or daisy in your lapel won't make anyone think you're the groom or best man. It's just a festive dash of colour for a special occasion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafoofan
I'd never wear a flower to a wedding these days unless in the wedding party and instructed. Whether we like it or not, it is a signifier of things and I don't want to break protocol.
That really won't fly in the US. The groom, best man, and groomsmen all wear flowers chosen by the bride and groom to designate them as such. Whatever you are wearing might wind up being the same or similar. Also, wearing flowers in your lapel, even to festive events, is highly unusual here. It would be conspicuous--a lot of other guests would assume you are serving some special function.
Hmm...just went to an event hosted by my fraternity. The dress code was black tie, although knowing them, I didn't think they knew what they were talking about. But I didn't give a duck and attended in black tie anyway, and as expected, was the only one wearing what could be considered black tie. Not even the guy who set the dress code.
Yes, I'm still in college, in the fraternity. The others mostly wore suits. I might have seen a few odd jackets; wasn't paying much attention, although one guy had a tux, but with a not-white shirt, not-black vest (not a waistcoat), and a patterned not-black bowtie.
Yes, I'm still in college, in the fraternity. The others mostly wore suits. I might have seen a few odd jackets; wasn't paying much attention, although one guy had a tux, but with a not-white shirt, not-black vest (not a waistcoat), and a patterned not-black bowtie.
Berate them for looking like assholes. That usually works with my friends.
Gentlemen, whats your take on button-up shirts with black-tie? Sometimes or never? How about barrel cuffs?
Currently unsure of sources, but aren't some advocating stiff-fronts only for white-tie?
If I understand button-up shirt to mean a standard white dress shirt, I'd say never. Wear a shirt that takes cufflinks and studs. Either the french cuff or link cuff variety. No barrel cuffs. A tuxedo shirt should be different from a plain white dress shirt.
Are you referring to the marcella style front by "stiff-front?" If so, a shirt in that style is perfectly fine to wear with black tie as is a shirt with tasteful pleats.