I realize it's unsportsmanlike to take aim at a sitting duck, but sometimes, to some people, even the most obvious things must be said.
i still say that they are a lot of people here full of themselve's. But off course asking someone who think's he's the next best thing to God if he is concealed is pointless.
I'm going to assume by "concealed" (which means "hidden") you actually mean "conceited." May I remind you that your entry into this forum was to complain to all of us how poorly other men dress compared to yourself, and also that you sign every message with the statement, "Erickus one of the last few well dressed man." (sic) To date, your posts are the most conceited I have ever seen on StyleForum.
As for class well responding in a manner of calling one a troll in the beginning is well...Ohhhh It is not even worth a respond.
And yet, respond, you did. Once again, you need to be reminded that you were only called a "troll" after
you accused most of the people here"”people whom you do not know nearly well enough to judge"”of being stupid, disrespectful and arrogant. To do such a thing is, well, stupid, disrepectful and arrogant. Furthermore, you decided we were "stupid" and "disrespectful" because, in response to your questions, we allowed our conversation to drift to subjects other than you and your issues. Believe it or not, this is not
a sign that our minds are so feeble that we can't remain focused on a simple question, nor that we are so rude that we are deliberately ignoring your vitally important queries. It's just that, unlike some people, we are sufficiently nimble-minded to engage in tangential discourse without losing sight of the original point. Since English is obviously not your first language"”at best, it's a distant second"”let me point out that "troll" does not only mean a dumb and ugly person (which description is derived from a mythical Scandinavian cave-dwelling humanoid creature), but also to fish by trailing one's bait or lure along in the water. Specifically in internet parlance, a "troll" is someone who posts inflammatory messages designed to get other people riled enough to "bite" (respond), as a fish on a big, fat hook. It was this last type of "troll" you were accused of being. The implications about my own intelligence for "biting" are not lost on me, but, after thirteen years online, I'm used to pulling hooks out of my mouth.
you just read the message but seem to lack the intelligence to understand it. And i still say that bragging about the fact that you have that many suits is well a show of you're lacking in class to proove this try walking up to a women or a new work place and start telling them how much Brionni suits you own watch for their reaction. Saying you own a Brionni is fine but having to specify how many of them you own is unnecessary and become's hotdogging.
It is you who lack the intelligence to understand that the gentleman who "bragged" about how many suits he owned was, in fact, joking...even after he told you he was joking.
He was exaggerating to make a point about how silly it is to be so obsessively proud of one's own wardrobe. Of course, you didn't mind when it was you, bragging about your Ralph Lauren Purple Label clothes. It was only when you thought you were being one-upped by guys with Brioni (not "Brionni") suits that you got upset.
a human being is an emotional creature and . Expresses in writing an emotion.
It doesn't express an emotion, but rather a high level of emotional intensity. It does this in much the same way as yelling does when one is speaking. Ending every single sentence with an exclamation point is the written equivalent of shouting everything you say in conversation. Which is to say, it's rude, it's counterproductive (people pay less attention to you, not more), and it makes you seem not so much "emotional" as "emotionally unstable." It is, of course, possible that everyone around you is wrong, and you alone are right; that you are simply so much smarter, more cultured, more civil and refined than the rest of us, that you can discern the errors of our ways while we our lowly selves are blind. On the other hand, it might behoove you to weigh the odds, and then consider that perhaps it is we who are onto something about you, and that it is your own behavior that warrants some quiet, constructive reflection. Personally, I think you're going to type a bunch of exclamation points and leave in an offended huff, but I'd rather you simply stopped taking either us or yourself so damned seriously, and hung around for a while. We shall see.