Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › UEFA Champions League 2011-12
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

UEFA Champions League 2011-12

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
GROUP A

22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png FC Bayern München
22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Villarreal CF
22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Manchester City FC
22px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png SSC Napoli



GROUP B

22px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png FC Internazionale Milano
22px-Flag_of_Russia.svg.png PFC CSKA Moscow
22px-Flag_of_France.svg.png LOSC Lille Métropole
22px-Flag_of_Turkey.svg.png Trabzonspor AŞ



GROUP C

22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Manchester United FC
22px-Flag_of_Portugal.svg.png SL Benfica
20px-Flag_of_Switzerland.svg.png FC Basel 1893
22px-Flag_of_Romania.svg.png FC Otelul Galati



GROUP D

22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Real Madrid CF
22px-Flag_of_France.svg.png Olympique Lyonnais
22px-Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg.png AFC Ajax
22px-Flag_of_Croatia.svg.png GNK Dinamo Zagreb



GROUP E

22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Chelsea FC
22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Valencia CF
22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Bayer 04 Leverkusen
22px-Flag_of_Belgium_%28civil%29.svg.png KRC Genk



GROUP F

22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Arsenal FC
22px-Flag_of_France.svg.png Olympique de Marseille
22px-Flag_of_Greece.svg.png Olympiacos FC
22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Borussia Dortmund



GROUP G

22px-Flag_of_Portugal.svg.png FC Porto
22px-Flag_of_Ukraine.svg.png FC Shakhtar Donetsk
22px-Flag_of_Russia.svg.png FC Zenit St Petersburg
22px-Flag_of_Cyprus.svg.png APOEL FC



GROUP H

22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png FC Barcelona
22px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png AC Milan
22px-Flag_of_Belarus.svg.png FC BATE Borisov
22px-Flag_of_the_Czech_Republic.svg.png FC Viktoria Plzen



Group A is an absolute killer.


Edited by venessian - 8/25/11 at 8:31pm
post #2 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by venessian View Post

GROUP A

22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Bayern Munich
22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Villarreal
22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Manchester City
22px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png Napoli



[
Group A is an absolute killer.



the Group of Death. Got to have one every year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by venessian View Post




GROUP E

22px-Flag_of_England.svg.png Chelsea
22px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Valencia
22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Bayer Leverkusen
22px-Flag_of_Belgium_%28civil%29.svg.png Genk




Group E looks rough as well.

I will have more to say after I give this some thought.
post #3 of 18
ManU with an easy group, where's the surprise there?
post #4 of 18
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reynard369 View Post

ManU with an easy group, where's the surprise there?
No kidding, it seems like this every year....




With the transfer season not yet closed and the season barely (or not all) underway, it is to ridiculous to try to predict, but what the hell.
I think these are the toughest groups ranked in order of difficulty, with picks for advancing teams in CL and Europa League.

1. Group A: Absolutely the most difficult. 4 very strong teams, with Man. City and Napoli as legitimate threats. All these matches will be a treat to watch; not a weak team among the 4.
Bayern Munich, Villarreal. More difficult for Villarreal if Rossi goes, esp. to Napoli (doubtful this year, though).
Europa League: Man. City? Napoli? Villarreal?


2. Group E: At least 3 tough teams. Neither Bayer Leverkusen nor Genk are pushovers.
Chelsea, Valencia.
Europa League: Bayer Leverkusen.


3. Group G: Not because of any dominant team(s), but because the group is well balanced among 3 teams. Both Shakhtar and Zenit have experience and the home matches in bitter cold will be tough.
Porto, Shakhtar Donetsk.
Europa League: Zenit St. Petersburg.


3. Group B: Inter should move on, but CSKA and Lille can be dangerous. CSKA is always tough at home. Hopefully Inter sign Forlan or Palacio, Lavezzi, Tevez.
Inter, Lille (but CSKA instead if Hazard leaves Lille).
Europa League: CSKA (or Lille).


3. Group F: Fairly balanced with at least 3 decent teams, all of which are in some transition. Marseille and (maybe) Olympiacos can compete. Arsene, have you decided on your signees yet?
Arsenal, Borussia Dortmund.
Europa League: Marseille.


6. Group D: Real and 3 others, but between Ajax, Lyon and Dinamo Zagreb it’s tough to call.
Real Madrid, Ajax.
Europa League: Lyon.


7. Group H: Severely unbalanced group. 2 Goliaths v. 2 baby Davids.
Barcelona, AC Milan.
Europa League: Viktoria Plzen.


8. Group C: Per usual, Man. United draw an early-rounds pass. Who the hell are Otelul Galati?
Man. United, Benfica.
Europa League: Basel.

At least Inter don’t have to go against a Schalke 04 or Rubin Kazan, but CSKA....

post #5 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by venessian View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
1. Group A: Absolutely the most difficult. 4 very strong teams, with Man. City and Napoli as legitimate threats. All these matches will be a treat to watch; not a weak team among the 4.
Bayern Munich, Villarreal. More difficult for Villarreal if Rossi goes, esp. to Napoli (doubtful this year, though).
Europa League: Man. City? Napoli? Villarreal?


2. Group E: At least 3 tough teams. Neither Bayer Leverkusen nor Genk are pushovers.
Chelsea, Valencia.
Europa League: Bayer Leverkusen.


3. Group G: Not because of any dominant team(s), but because the group is well balanced among 3 teams. Both Shakhtar and Zenit have experience and the home matches in bitter cold will be tough.
Porto, Shakhtar Donetsk.
Europa League: Zenit St. Petersburg.


3. Group B: Inter should move on, but CSKA and Lille can be dangerous. CSKA is always tough at home. Hopefully Inter sign Forlan or Palacio, Lavezzi, Tevez.
Inter, Lille (but CSKA instead if Hazard leaves Lille).
Europa League: CSKA (or Lille).


3. Group F: Fairly balanced with at least 3 decent teams, all of which are in some transition. Marseille and (maybe) Olympiacos can compete. Arsene, have you decided on your signees yet?
Arsenal, Borussia Dortmund.
Europa League: Marseille.


6. Group D: Real and 3 others, but between Ajax, Lyon and Dinamo Zagreb it’s tough to call.
Real Madrid, Ajax.
Europa League: Lyon.


7. Group H: Severely unbalanced group. 2 Goliaths v. 2 baby Davids.
Barcelona, AC Milan.
Europa League: Viktoria Plzen.


8. Group C: Per usual, Man. United draw an early-rounds pass. Who the hell are Otelul Galati?
Man. United, Benfica.
Europa League: Basel.


I like your picks, but here are a few which I would change:

Group A: Bayern and City. I just think City has too many excellent players to not grab at least 2nd in the group, and a keeper who will give them an excellent chance of advancing if it comes down to goal differential.

Group F: Borussia and Marseille. If Arsenal decides to finally sign someone, then this could change. But with the teams in their current states, physically and mentally, I wouldn't put money on Arsenal moving through. Arsenal has so much pressure on them and a bunch of young guys attempting to handle it at the moment.

Group D: Real Madrid and Lyon. I was really impressed with what I saw from Lyon in their last few Champs play-off games or whatever their games against Rubin Kazan counted as. They seem to have a solid team, and I wouldn't be surprised for them to get 7 points from their home matches.
Edited by tullytra - 8/26/11 at 12:54pm
post #6 of 18
Thread Starter 
^
I could easily see those picks too. It will be fun to watch.
post #7 of 18
Thread Starter 
These ridiculous UEFA rules....

Diego Forlan cannot play in any Champions League match for Inter until February.

In July/August he played for Atletico Madrid in their 2 Europa League 3rd qualifying round matches. AM won that round, but were not yet qualified for the Europa League group stage. AM had to win their playoff round in order to advance to the EL group stage. They did, but Forlan did not play in either match.

Inter will be playing in the Champions League group stage starting Sept. 14. Under UEFA rules, a player cannot play in EL/CL matches for one team, be traded, and play in EL/CL matches for the second team that same season if there is a chance that the 2 teams could meet.

I think this is absurd...if a team decides to trade away a player, why affect that player's participation in future matches for his new team? Does this rule exist in any other professional sport?

However, Inter could be eliminated in the CL group stage, and be relegated to the EL knockout phase, while AM could advance from the EL group stage to the knockout phase, and so Inter-Atletico could meet each other then.... Could, could, could.

That's an awful lot of coulds, and I think unfairly penalizes teams (I suppose there may be other transferred players in this same situation, or that there have been in the past). This rule is ridiculous, and I wish UEFA would just simplify it to state that were Inter-Atletico to meet in EL knockout matches, Forlan would not be eligible for those direct matches.

So, Forlan will only be eligible to play for Inter in the CL if Inter advance to the CL knockout phase in February, thereby assuring that they will not play Atletico in UEFA tournaments this season.

I'm confident Inter will advance, that they have enough forwards to take his place in the CL group stage, and so he'll be rested for the CL knockout phase, but still this rule baldy[1].gifffffuuuu.gifcensored.gif....
Edited by venessian - 9/4/11 at 5:49pm
post #8 of 18
What is the purpose of that rule anyway? It just prevents a quality player from participating in the CL.

Damn intl break, killing me.
post #9 of 18
Thread Starter 
^
Apparently the "UEFA logic" is as follows:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia 
Application
Cup-tied is an adjective, used primarily in association football, to describe a player who is ineligible to play in a knockout cup competition after transferring from another club during that competition.

In virtually all domestic and international club cup competitions, any player who makes an appearance for a club at any stage of the competition is "tied" to that club for all future matches during that season in the same competition. This prevents a wealthy, still competing team from gaining an unfair advantage by signing talented players from clubs that may have lost out in earlier rounds, in an attempt to increase their cup chances.
eh.gif

I think it's an absurd rule. I cannot think of another professional sport that does that.

A team trades a player...that should be that. He should be able to play for his new team in whatever context. It's already hard on teams when their players get called up by national teams. I really don't see the point of this rule. It deprives the player of experience with his new team, it deprives the coach of an option, and it deprives the fans who want to see the player play.

I suppose situations like this are not so common, but they do happen. To restrict Forlan (or any player) from playing in CL on the miniscule chance that Inter might meet Atleti in EL later is just complete bs....

The rule is even more ridiculous given that, if Inter were to play AM in EL, Inter would probably not even play Forlan against them, due to being disappointed in being knocked out of CL, not giving a shit about the stupid EL, and, mainly, wanting to keep him fresh for Serie A and Coppa Italia at that point....

From this Wiki article, this is just a small list of players who have been restricted ("cup-tied") with their new teams. It's crazy.
Earl Barrett > Aston Villa to Everton, 1995.
Fernando Morientes > Real Madrid to Liverpool, 2005.
Robbie Fowler > Man City to Liverpool, 2006.
Ronaldo > Real Madrid to A.C. Milan, 2007.
Jermain Defoe > Tottenham to Portsmouth, 2008.
Andrei Arshavin > Zenit St. Petersburg to Arsenal, 2009.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia 
Criticism
The cup-tied rule comes in for criticism from various fans and media pundits, particularly when a high profile player is ineligible for significant matches. Some argue that the rule is antiquated and that since the introduction of transfer windows, clubs cannot buy players solely for cup matches, but will only do so for the league (in which there is no cup-tie rule).

Others argue that a purchasing team ought to be able to field its new player as it sees fit, and his or her eligibility for cup competition ought not to be affected by the matches played for previous clubs.


Exactly!

post #10 of 18
There is a Champions League Fantasy League at http://en.uclfantasy.uefa.com/

Does anyone want to start a SF league?
post #11 of 18
Thread Starter 
September 13, 2011

GROUP E
Chelsea FC 2 - Bayer 04 Leverkusen 0
KRC Genk 0 - Valencia CF 0

GROUP F
Borussia Dortmund 1 - Arsenal FC 1
Olympiacos FC 0 - Olympique de Marseille 1

GROUP G
APOEL Nicosia FC 2 - FC Zenit St Petersburg 1 (that's a stunner)
FC Porto 2 - FC Shakhtar Donetsk 1

GROUP H
FC Viktoria Plzen 1 - FC BATE Borisov 1
FC Barcelona 2 - AC Milan 2 (I watched the 2nd half of this match; what a snoozer...Milan super defensive, Barca controlling but not quite enough, Milan saved by 2 minutes of offense...)
post #12 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by venessian View Post

FC Barcelona 2 - AC Milan 2 (I watched the 2nd half of this match; what a snoozer...Milan super defensive, Barca controlling but not quite enough, Milan saved by 2 minutes of offense...)

Yeah. They scored in the first 30 seconds and last 30 seconds and in between played scared and defensive.

Doesn't matter...Barca and Milan will both advance out of the group stage regardless.
post #13 of 18
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by embowafa View Post

Yeah. They scored in the first 30 seconds and last 30 seconds and in between played scared and defensive.

Doesn't matter...Barca and Milan will both advance out of the group stage regardless.
Definitely. Easiest group of the lot, along with Man. U's.



September 14, 2011

GROUP A
Manchester City FC 1 - SSC Napoli 1
Villarreal CF 0 - FC Bayern München 2

GROUP B
FC Internazionale Milano 0 - Trabzonspor AŞ 1 frown.gif
LOSC Lille Métropole 2 - PFC CSKA Moscow 2

GROUP C
FC Basel 1893 2 - FC Otelul Galati 1
SL Benfica 1 - Manchester United FC 1

GROUP D
AFC Ajax 0 - Olympique Lyonnais 0
GNK Dinamo Zagreb 0 - Real Madrid CF 1

Napoli and Benfica did well to tie City and United.

Inter = ffffuuuu.gif

post #14 of 18
Not that I mind terribly - but why not just lump this in with the basic 2012 Futbol-football-voetbal-futebol-calcio thread...?
post #15 of 18
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Argentino View Post

Not that I mind terribly - but why not just lump this in with the basic 2012 Futbol-football-voetbal-futebol-calcio thread...?

I thought about that, but then I thought that the general thread might get really bloated, mainly, plus that CL is different from the regular season, more specific.. Then I searched and saw that there in fact were many CL=, Euro, WC-specific threads in the past, so I thought it was OK.

It doesn't matter to me either way; if someone can merge the 2 threads that's fine.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › UEFA Champions League 2011-12