Quote:
Originally Posted by
bl@ster 
I've found this to not be the case. I even measured the 3 Polo RL button down shirts vs the 4 D&S button down shirts. On average the D&S shirts measured 1" less in the chest.
Sorry for introducing actual data into the discussion!
Which model & which cut? I have a few dozen work shirts from RL and they all very drastically depending on model and cut, even with in a single product like (RLBL, RLPL, RL Polo, Blue Label, ect....) The other factor is "made to tuck: or "made to be un-tucked"