or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Equus Leather - Bridle Leather Belts - Official Affiliate Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Equus Leather - Bridle Leather Belts - Official Affiliate Thread - Page 36

post #526 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick_b View Post


 
I uploaded the wrong two images. I had one showing the entire belt. However, they do show where to measure from on the buckle end smile.gif

I figured as much. At least we cleared up how far to measure on the buckle end because of your pictures.
post #527 of 1494
I'm getting 34" from where the buckle and leather meet until the hole normally used. My trousers are also size 34, which is why I think I am doing something wrong.
post #528 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxgenius View Post

I'm getting 34" from where the buckle and leather meet until the hole normally used. My trousers are also size 34, which is why I think I am doing something wrong.

My trouser size is close to what I ordered my Equus belts in. I think I ordered 31, most of my pants are size 30, but I am true waist 33.
post #529 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxgenius View Post

I'm getting 34" from where the buckle and leather meet until the hole normally used. My trousers are also size 34, which is why I think I am doing something wrong.

If it's any reassurance, I'm exactly the same (34 measurement, 34 waist (sometimes 33 depending on the cut)). Charlie reassured me that I should go with the measurement. I only placed the order about nine days ago, so I can't attest that that was correct, but I just decided to go with it. It helped me to know that, with the total length of the belts, it wasn't like they would be unwearable if things were off a bit.
post #530 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxgenius View Post

I'm getting 34" from where the buckle and leather meet until the hole normally used. My trousers are also size 34, which is why I think I am doing something wrong.

Remember, that measurement is to the center hole, allowing for several inches of adjustment in either direction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Six View Post

If it's any reassurance, I'm exactly the same (34 measurement, 34 waist (sometimes 33 depending on the cut)). Charlie reassured me that I should go with the measurement. I only placed the order about nine days ago, so I can't attest that that was correct, but I just decided to go with it. It helped me to know that, with the total length of the belts, it wasn't like they would be unwearable if things were off a bit.


Excellent point.
post #531 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick_b View Post

Remember, that measurement is to the center hole, allowing for several inches of adjustment in either direction.

That's not what the guide says.
post #532 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxgenius View Post

That's not what the guide says.

I think you are misinterpreting what the guide says.
http://www.equusleather.co.uk/index.php/Belt-Sizing-Guide.html

The first paragraph says that the size you tell Charlie will be the middle hole in the belt he makes, so there will be three holes adjustment both larger and smaller.

Then there are three examples of how to determine which size to tell Charlie to make. I think this is where the confusion is. In #1, which is preferred, you are measuring an actual belt that you have, and you are measuring to the hole you use. This is your "actual" belt size. This measurement will be the middle hole on your new belt. So, for instance, if you've gained weight over the years and are now using the last hole, Charlie's belt is going to adjust for that and put your current waist at the middle hole.

#'2 and #3 are estimates based on clothing size. There are a few reason these are not as accurate. First, you are not measuring the belt or your waist, but rather a piece of fabric. It is not only more prone to measuring error, but you also have to account for the bulk of the pants themselves. For example, you may have exactly a 34" waist, and the inside of the pants may measure exactly 34", but when you add on the thickness of the cotton/wool and lining, etc., it could add another 1" to the circumference.

The other reason is that marked clothing sizes are often not accurate. It is not uncommon at all for pants to actually measure 1-2" more than they are tagged; e.g.: the label says 34, but they are actually 36. So if you used what the tag said, there is a good chance that you could be understating how big the belt has to be.

Finally, there is one other factor that I don't think anyone has mentioned, which is that most off the rack belts give the size to the last hole. So, for instance, a 34 belt is 34 at the last hole, but only 32 at the middle hole. This is why most stores tell you to buy a belt that is 2" larger than your waist.

Because Charlie is doing this by hand and trying to be accurate, he is going against some of the clothing industry conventions. But he is getting your exact measurements and doing it correctly.

Just remember - what you are telling him is how long the belt has to be to reach around your waist, so that it buckles at the middle hole.
post #533 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmdsimpson View Post

Finally, there is one other factor that I don't think anyone has mentioned, which is that most off the rack belts give the size to the last hole. So, for instance, a 34 belt is 34 at the last hole, but only 32 at the middle hole. This is why most stores tell you to buy a belt that is 2" larger than your waist.

That's interesting I always thought OTR belts measured to the middle hole too.
post #534 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston S. View Post

That's interesting I always thought OTR belts measured to the middle hole too.

I'm sure it varies, but I've found it to be pretty common.

Here is Ralph Lauren's belt size chart from their website. Notice the belt size is 2" larger than pants size. Could be that the pants are vanity sized, or could be that the measurement is to the last hole:




And here is J. Crew's. See the note at the bottom of the chart: "Generally men size up one size when buying belts"




Charlie's method is basically saying "tell me your ACTUAL measurement, and that's the size I'll make."
post #535 of 1494
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmdsimpson View Post

I'm sure it varies, but I've found it to be pretty common.

Here is Ralph Lauren's belt size chart from their website. Notice the belt size is 2" larger than pants size. Could be that the pants are vanity sized, or could be that the measurement is to the last hole:




And here is J. Crew's. See the note at the bottom of the chart: "Generally men size up one size when buying belts"




Charlie's method is basically saying "tell me your ACTUAL measurement, and that's the size I'll make."

This is exactly it - we work to literal measurements, the idea being you know what your going to get and we know what we're going to make.

For the avoidance of doubt the measurement you order/we quote is always to the middle hole of how ever many you chose to have 3,5,7,etc. Given a 7 hole belt you'll have 3 holes bigger than the size you order and 3 holes smaller so lots of room for error. The idea is partially room for manover sizing wise, but really what we're trying to do is to make somthing that will be an old friend, and as such we take into account people grow and shrink over long periods. My own belt in the photos a page ago is a good example, I have lost 2" of trouser size since it was new but still happily wearable and I have 1 hole smaller left to go. Of course we can do as many or as few holes as people want, but thats why we default to the centre of 7 for the sizing.

Charlie
post #536 of 1494
Thread Starter 
Just a quick heads up to let you know about a discount code we are running for the next 24hrs.

12% discount when you type in BRIDE12

Also, remember we send leather samples anywhere in the world, just email dawn@equusleather.co.uk for a free pack.

Dawn
post #537 of 1494
Thread Starter 
Hi All,

As promised I got a few suede samples through the other day and its looking pretty good. This is much more our type of leather compared with the suedes Ive seen so far which were pretty rubbish, this is 4mm or so English leather thats made for the flaps of polo saddles with quite a short, tight nap so it'll last well. the first piece will be a light Snuff colour - I'm looking forward to seeing it. There will no doubt be photos in due course!

Charlie
post #538 of 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Equus Leather View Post

Hi All,

As promised I got a few suede samples through the other day and its looking pretty good. This is much more our type of leather compared with the suedes Ive seen so far which were pretty rubbish, this is 4mm or so English leather thats made for the flaps of polo saddles with quite a short, tight nap so it'll last well. the first piece will be a light Snuff colour - I'm looking forward to seeing it. There will no doubt be photos in due course!

Charlie

Excited to see the sample belt.
post #539 of 1494
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston S. View Post

Excited to see the sample belt.

Me too! Fun playing with new designs and nice to have a new Summer season product, it might push the weather on a bit!

Charlie
post #540 of 1494
I need another Charlie and Dawn creation...Winchester quick release OR Stirrup buckle are intriguing, but not offered in 1 3/4 width (only with West End)....Charlie, any plans on a double-ring variety?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Equus Leather - Bridle Leather Belts - Official Affiliate Thread