Quote:
Originally Posted by Jodum5
Huntsman, you may believe its pathetic but its a real one.
Oh, I had no doubt that it was your real opinion. Sorry about the pathetic -- was a little dig for the earlier prick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jodum5
There are numerable times in our lives when people do bad things that directly or indirectly affect us yet we do not "rat" them out. For example, When you're driving on the highway [no doubt] at the speed limit do you call the cops everytime someone passes you (obviously over the speed limit)? They're speeding affects your safety. What about Jay walkers? Littering?
Rarely are there people who are in a priviledged position who do inappropriate things that have strong negative consequences for me. None of your examples qualify, anyway, you're trying to reduce it to the absurd, and I'd call for a little moderation.
If speeders are driving decently they're fine with me -- I subscribe to the European dictum of driving right. I even like to give 'most' people who are driving badly or really speeding a pass -- I don't know what is going on in their lives that day, and I remember a day I flew home for a medical emergency. I also remember days I wasn't on form and maybe was teetering on unsafe.
I would call the cops on some of the obviously drunk or stoned drivers I've seen as they are a direct threat to me and others, which is closer to cheating than speeding, though obviously this is apples and oranges, I'm just tryng to stay in your schema.
Jay walkers? You're kidding me. Most of the time they look, so as not to affect me, and if they don't they've probably just screwed up. You can't cheat in such a way as to not affect others, nor can you do it by accident.
Litter? Yeah, that makes me suffer financial loss, puts me in an inferior position on paper for a job/scholarship, and give the litterbug some serious rewards.
[/quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jodum5
I can go on. I'm sorry that you got screwed out of money by some cheater but if you think about it, them risking a failing grade or worse consequences for their pretty ridiculous cheating methods (and ridicolous test management by the professors - bathroom breaks and cell phone calls during tests??) is rewarded by the financial reward.
So, if by cheating blatantly or by taking advantage of a Prof who tries to respect them should only be punished by the risk they accept in the action, please tell me why that doesn't justify skimming some funds off an employer? They risk being fired, and if their employer isn't watching them like a hawk, well it's the firm's lookout!
As for the test management -- I agree that some of the things they get away with is ridiculous. But I don't like feeling like a locked-down criminal in an exam, either. I know from speaking with faculty that they don't want to do that, and hope that the students will have a modicum of decency. I get it sometimes when the Prof's really a prick, but some of these guys are really great and bend over backward to get screwed by their students.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jodum5
Kind regards,
Jodum5
Likewise,
Huntsman