Originally Posted by GBR
Then it is a significant error in accepting it and one which might have been better tested first.
This. I find it very hard to believe that the majority of those invited to test the system before going live were perfectly ok with the layout, unless they are biased and have close relationships with Fok and co. and scared to tell it like it is.
Even if the majority was cool with it, I cannot believe that there was a decision to go live with what we have right now. Exluding the whole right hand margin/ugly front page controversies, there are so many bugs and performance issues, that if this was implemented by a real business, someone would be in trouble. I can even potentially excuse the fact that if this was something put in place by people who do not do this for a living, but to pay for this redesign, implementation and support (which is a big assumption on my part) is mind boggling.