Originally Posted by johanm
I thought he was disapproving of people deviating from their stylistic identity (his being ivy league) on the weekends. The irony with those GATs is that visually they work perfectly with the casual dad outfit, but the history (Belgian reinterpretation of German army kit) could hardly be more inconsistent with an unadulterated ivy league aesthetic.
(this post is intended only to bait vox...)
Originally Posted by DocHolliday
You guys are reading a lot more into it than I did. I thought his point was that if a guy can't follow the relatively straightforward coat-and-tie template, there was little chance he'd be able to process and articulate SW&D aesthetics any more successfully.
I believe it was both of these points, although I wouldn't say he disapproved of people deviating, he just wanted to point out that it is possible for someone who wears "classic men's clothing" to also wear "classic casual clothing". Moreover, this style is perhaps more easily pulled off and is arguably more appropriate for the average MC-er.
And then yeah, people who look like shit are still gonna look like shit.