or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › WAYWRN: MC Casual Style
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

WAYWRN: MC Casual Style - Page 852

post #12766 of 16176
That's why I have a contrasting under-penis.
post #12767 of 16176
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Moo View Post

This is MC, right?

2w5sit3.jpg

Lifestylez - protecting my daughter from a man in a rhino costume. She was terrified. She's wearing a Geller jeans jacket and CDG everything else. Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
2zgzot5.jpg

Long jacket and stacked jeans (plus maybe camera angle) makes you look out of proportion with elongated torso and short legs. This is why stacked jeans rarely looks good IMO.
post #12768 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Citan1145 View Post

I feel the shoes would look better with jeans or something than the chinolinos. A word on sleek shoes, some people dislike them based upon the profile of their foot or, in my case, because sleek shoes are usually too narrow for my wider feet. Just an fyi for those always advocating them.

The jacket looks like it fits in the shoulders but is tight in the chest and splaying open at the quarters. Do you happen to have narrow shoulders for your build? I.e. would sizing up in the chest/waist of the jacket make the shoulders too large? Would try it next time you try an OTR jacket.

Just my 2 cents.

the jacket is completely unlined, and very light weight, so it wrinkles extremely easily. it's actually a little big in the chest, but fits well in the shoulders.

the shoes are not clunky, it's the camera angle.

see how the door, instead of being a rectangle, isn't?

acecow you once again prove how fucking dumb you are.
post #12769 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleyVanBuren View Post

there's nothing wrong with those shoes.
 


Nothing wrong with the length of the pants either

post #12770 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teger View Post

preparing to blast off (90 fucking degrees today)

AppleMark

joseph abboud linen/cotton/cashmere/wool jacket
luxire linen shirt
trafalgar belt
brooks brothers linen/cotton pants
mcnairy shoes

Nice look overall, but the blazer doesn't fit. Too short in length and too high of a waist/buttoning point. Shouldn't be seeing through to your shirt and belt buckle like that.

Also, those chunky shoes look awkward with the tapered pants.
post #12771 of 16176
yea. personally i like pants hemmed with 0 break. i find any sort of stacking/puddling on the shoe really sloppy looking.
post #12772 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teger View Post

the jacket is completely unlined, and very light weight, so it wrinkles extremely easily. it's actually a little big in the chest, but fits well in the shoulders.

the shoes are not clunky, it's the camera angle.

see how the door, instead a rectangle, isn't?

acecow you once again prove how fucking dumb you are.

Whoah lighten up Francis. You post pictures, you're gonna get critique. You might not agree with said critique but no need to be coarse. It's only a message board.
post #12773 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teger View Post

yea. personally i like pants hemmed with 0 break. i find any sort of stacking/puddling on the shoe really sloppy looking.


pents look fyne bro...

 

 

but chill doh, acecow has every right to offer his critique, even though I disagree with him.

post #12774 of 16176
acecow is a moron. it's true today and was true a year ago.
post #12775 of 16176
^ You asked for constructive criticism on your fit. Acecow gave you good advice. Jacket doesn't fit. Shoes are too clunky. (lol if you think mcnairy shoes are sleek, you're delusional, nothing to do with the camera angle)

If you're going to be a petulant, vulgar whiner and not take anyone's advice in stride, don't post here.
post #12776 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrd617 View Post

^ You asked for constructive criticism on your fit. Acecow gave you good advice. Jacket doesn't fit. Shoes are too clunky. (lol if you think mcnairy shoes are sleek, you're delusional, nothing to do with the camera angle)

If you're going to be a petulant, vulgar whiner and not take anyone's advice in stride, don't post here.

please. acecow and i have personal history, and it's clear from his reply that he wasn't offering 'constructive' criticism, he was looking for an opportunity to talk shit. i'm happy to discuss the merits or many weakness of my outfit, but why respond to ridiculous trolling when it's clear that the camera angle is distorting the image? i promise you i'm not 80% leg, and that my neck isn't smaller than my wrist.

the biggest issue with the outfit is the contrast between the brown of the shoes and the lightness of the trousers. needs something in dark tan or light grey.

mcnairy shoes are sanders, so yes they can sleek or clunky, depending on the sole treatment or the particular design.

this is the shoe in question -

it's sanders standard plain toe blucher,



i had them resoled on a single crepe sole. it's not particularly sleek, but it's also not a gunboat. somewhere in between.
post #12777 of 16176
Fit battle:


tumblr_mayk40G5J61rf1jvro1_1280.jpg

Vox wins in every category, except shirt sleeve length.

Notice how much more proportionate the shoes are with the slim pants?
post #12778 of 16176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teger View Post




i had them resoled on a single crepe sole. it's not particularly sleek, but it's also not a gunboat. somewhere in between.

cash-4-clunker-dumpster-adjpg-lg.jpg
post #12779 of 16176
i have a feeling that vox's picture wasn't taken from the vantage point of a shoe box on the floor, but yes i agree that vox's outfit is better. there's a big difference between bespoke everything and dirt cheap OTR, so...
post #12780 of 16176
this is a clunky shoe:

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › WAYWRN: MC Casual Style