STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Is there a reason that some of the brands don't use full insoles for the footbed? Annoying when they start to "peel" up when I take the shoes off. EG, C&J, not sure about Lobb?
Is there a reason that some of the brands don't use full insoles for the footbed?
Is there a reason that some of the brands don't use full insoles (sockliners?) for the footbed?
Oddly enough, considering the bad rap Church's get here, I have never had a Church's sock peel.
Church's only uses a short (heel only) sock. - Most other ready-to-wear manufacturers use a sock of half length.
George Cleverley
Traditional English shoemakers, be they bespoke or ready to wear use either a short (just the heel) or half-long ‘sock’ (insole liner), but not a full sole one. Surely, if the shoemaker uses a top-class oak tanned insole, why would you want to cover it up with a layer of inferior leather (and a layer of glue as an additional barrier) to prevent the insole from wicking away the foot’s moisture at it’s most efficient? A ‘sock’ is only a necessity under the heel, as there is a row of nails which need to be covered.