or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment and Culture › 2011 Miss America Contestants: Should Evolution Be Taught In Schools?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2011 Miss America Contestants: Should Evolution Be Taught In Schools? - Page 3

post #31 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
3 as in she's just ugly but decent body shape, or 3 as in fugly fattie?

i have kade standards so a 3 is automatically the latter, the fomer would be a 5 or 6
post #32 of 71
Well 3 would be a stretch. But I would probably date a 4 that's smart then an 8 that's dumb. Personally I just can't do fatties.
post #33 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
But I would probably date a 4 that's smart then an 8 that's dumb. .
No way, dude. Date? Befriend, maybe. But date? A fucking 4 is pretty rank. Some degree of sexual attraction needs to be present for someone to be datable. Would take the dumb 8 over the smart 4 any day of the week. Now, a dumb 8 vs. a smart 6? Now we have an interesting challenge.
post #34 of 71
I do not see myself dating any of those girls posted in the video, granted some of them aren't even 8s'. I have been around dumb girls before, not pleasant experiences. By dating, I mean having a relationship, not just fuck dates.
post #35 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
I do not see myself dating any of those girls posted in the video, granted some of them aren't even 8s'. I have been around dumb girls before, not pleasant experiences. By dating, I mean having a relationship, not just fuck dates.
Would you not agree that a strong relationship involves fucking? Fucking isn't the only aspect of a relationship, but it is one of the most foundational and thus critical. I have been in relationships with girls I didn't enjoy fucking all that much. These relationships were very short lived, regardless of how smart or sweet or funny or charming the girls were.
post #36 of 71
I agree. That's why these types of questions are tricky because we are making broad assumptions and generalizations. If the girl has a decent body, not hot, but decent and a mediocre face (a 4 or 5) in my book, I would definitely choose her to date then a hot blonde with no brain cells at all. It will be hard to carry on intelligent conversations with the dumbs though. Very hard.
post #37 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
I agree. That's why these types of questions are tricky because we are making broad assumptions and generalizations. If the girl has a decent body, not hot, but decent and a mediocre face (a 4 or 5) in my book, I would definitely choose her to date then a hot blonde with no brain cells at all. It will be hard to carry on intelligent conversations with the dumbs though. Very hard.

I get what you're saying. I think we differ in that you assign different weights/preferences to looks and brains than I do.

Looks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brains in my personal opinion. But I admit that it's just my opinion.
post #38 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
Not sure if I should cry for America or laugh at these dumb bimbos and those who view them as idols.

probably both.

but on a serious note, these girls have been "coached" out the wazoo by all forms of wackjobs since they were probably 3 or 4 years old. they dont know which way is up at this point much less have any idea what turds are falling out of their mouths.

they are just repeating a script while smiling. they might as well be saying oh i think aliens are invading the planet and we need to build 16 lane highways out of cotton candy to save ourselves. sure they are retarded but its been foced upon them for the most part by their ugly botox infused moms living vicariously through their bimbo daughters with bottom feeding life coaches at their side

/rant
post #39 of 71
The ironic thing is I don't even find majority of these chicks hot. I see much better in Kansas City on daily basis.
post #40 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
Would you not agree that a strong relationship involves fucking? Fucking isn't the only aspect of a relationship, but it is one of the most foundational and thus critical.

a lot of truth here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
I get what you're saying. I think we differ in that you assign different weights/preferences to looks and brains than I do.

Looks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brains in my personal opinion. But I admit that it's just my opinion.

wont get you anywhere long term.

to sustain a succesful and happy long term relationship both people need to be physically attracted to eachother with compatible sexual needs AND be mentally on a level enough playing feild so they dont get bored and frustrated with eachother.

just my opinion
post #41 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post
a lot of truth here wont get you anywhere long term. to sustain a succesful and happy long term relationship both people need to be physically attracted to eachother with compatible sexual needs AND be mentally on a level enough playing feild so they dont get bored and frustrated with eachother. just my opinion
Depends how you define long term. Purely anecdotal experience here, but I've dated girls at both ends of the spectrum, and here's how they bore out: - Dated an incredibly smart, but mediocre looking girl. Relationship lasted 8 months. - Dated a refuckingdiculously hot, but dumb girl. Relationship lasted 3 years. - Dated a really hot and really smart girl. She was nuts, and her lunacy ended up being too much to bear.
post #42 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
Depends how you define long term. Purely anecdotal experience here, but I've dated girls at both ends of the spectrum, and here's how they bore out:

- Dated an incredibly smart, but mediocre looking girl. Relationship lasted 8 months.

- Dated a refuckingdiculously hot, but dumb girl. Relationship lasted 3 years.

- Dated a really hot and really smart girl. She was nuts, and her lunacy ended up being too much to bear.

im talking marriage material only.

if there is no intent on going for the long haul whats the fucking diference. take what you have for what its worth for as long as you can. fuck much, challenge each other much, have fun much and move on when the time comes. maybe a dumb way of seeing things but thats how i see it
post #43 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
- Dated a really hot and really smart girl. She was nuts, and her lunacy ended up being too much to bear.

Those wiminz are designated undate-ble in my book. Both of my serious relationships involved 2 incredibly hot Asian girls. Neither was extremely book smart, but they were definitely not dumb.
post #44 of 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prada_Ferragamo View Post
Those wiminz are designated undateable in my book.

the wimmenz are marriage material in my book.
post #45 of 71
Just for the record, these are Miss USA contestants, not Miss America.

While some people may not draw a distinction between the two - and I would suspect some women compete in both - Miss America is the world's largest scholarship organization for women, while Miss USA was founded as a promotional event for a swimsuit company, is owned by Donald Trump, and apparently sponsored by Las Vegas Tourism.

While the people who say they don't think evolution should be taught in schools clearly sound ignorant, I think the more insidious answer is the "both sides of the story answer" that presents creationism and evolution as equivalents.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment and Culture › 2011 Miss America Contestants: Should Evolution Be Taught In Schools?