4 points:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
The problem with everything posted is that it all represents an almost ironic application of a man's suit (fabric, detailing, even cut in some cases) to a woman's body. I personally don't find that approach appealing and am not surprised that it often doesn't look good.
1. AFAICS there is nothing inherently ironic about a woman wearing a "man's suit" unless you are operating within the paradigm that only men should wear suits (in which case I'm not surprised you find it unattractive), or adhere to the the othodoxy you mention below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
A skirt suit is the classic format of business suit for women. By the strictest business formal standards, a woman is supposed to wear a skirt suit, not a pant suit. In fact, if you've bothered to observe, women in positions of power commonly wear skirt suits. Hillary Clinton is ridiculed for her pant suits precisely because it is not the norm.
2. Consider the origin of this orthodoxy? Women, or men?

Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
Moreover, if you haven't noticed, men and women have different sorts of bodies. It's only to be expected that different sorts of clothing will best flatter those bodies.
3. I don't see how skirts flatter female figures more than pants necessarily. Women have been wearing pants and rocking them for ages, not sure why a skirt is somehow the better option, sense that you're trying justify your personal preference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
mafoofan 
Anyway, I could make the equally stupid argument that you are a chauvinist for thinking that a woman must dress like a man to appear confident and sophisticated.
4. Not sure where he mentioned a woman
must dress like a man to...
