or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Difference between stylish and effete?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Difference between stylish and effete?

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
For me, cufflinks, monograms, fitted shirts, horsebit loafers, logoed polo shorts, collar bars, and Hermes ties are just too much. Where do you draw the line between fashionable and foppish?
post #2 of 19
Well, I agree that wearing all of those items at once would be a bit too much. Individually, though, with the exception of the monograms and the logoed polo shirts, I think that all can work given the correct individual. As for me, I don't worry about the line between fashionable and foppish. I trust my aesthetic sensibility and wear what I like and what I think is appropriate.
post #3 of 19
It's your choice and your line.
post #4 of 19
Quote:
Individually, though, with the exception of the monograms and the logoed polo shirts, I think that all can work given the correct individual.
I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand. Does this mean you do not like logoed polo shirts and monograms? I have monogrammed shirts from Jantzen, but they are monogrammed in the yoke so no one gets to see them. I also bought several Lacoste polo shirts recently. For me, I do not like anything that is loud. Cuff links, tight shirts, monograms, Hermes ties, logoed polo shirts can be subtle/simple and hence acceptable. But ocassionaly it might be considered stylish to wear, say, a very plain white shirt with jeans and an outrageous pair of cuff links.
post #5 of 19
Quote:
I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand. Does this mean you do not like logoed polo shirts and monograms?
Yes, that is what I mean. I think that if Polo or Lacoste want me to advertise their shirts, they should pay me to do so instead of me paying them. As for monograms, I can remember who I am, so I don't need them. Discreetly done, however, I have no objection to them for others if that's what they want.
post #6 of 19
Haha, very well said.
post #7 of 19
I hate those Gucci hats with monogram G's all over them. It looks so tacky/stupid/rediculous/angering. And I also think the men's Seven for all mankind jeans have a pretty effete cut.. I don't care for it. Cufflinks I love, and all my shirts are "fitted" (otherwise I don't wear them).
post #8 of 19
Quote:
For me, cufflinks, monograms, fitted shirts, horsebit loafers, logoed polo shorts, collar bars, and Hermes ties are just too much.  Where do you draw the line between fashionable and foppish?
Yeah, fitted shirts are really foppish..I much prefer to have heinous amounts of fabric billowing forth.
post #9 of 19
Well, there's fitted, and then there's fitted. Of course you want any piece of clothing to fit according to your proportions. But, some men wear shirts that fit on them like a second skin; unbutton a few buttons and you've got Saturday Night Fever for the new millennium. The look is feminine - I'm not into it.
post #10 of 19
In order to wear a properly fitted suit, one needs a properly fitted shirt. The two go hand-in-hand.
post #11 of 19
can someone please define the words 'foppish' and 'effete'? i don't know what you guys are talking about. i agree that it is tacky to wear clothing with logos/advertising on them. there is a big difference between something that is fitted and something that is tight. too many people are using these words interchangeably. what's so different about an hermes tie? i don't like jewelry on men, so that leaves out collar bars and cufflinks, though silk knots are cool on formal occasions.
post #12 of 19
Quote:
i agree that it is tacky to wear clothing with logos/advertising on them.
Can an exception be made for the crocodile? I just bought four of them.
post #13 of 19
Quote:
Quote:
i agree that it is tacky to wear clothing with logos/advertising on them.
Can an exception be made for the crocodile? I just bought four of them.
NO EXCEPTIONS...
post #14 of 19
Quote:
Quote:
i agree that it is tacky to wear clothing with logos/advertising on them.
Can an exception be made for the crocodile? I just bought four of them.
Oh, I think it will be fine as long as your collar is up...
post #15 of 19
Quote:
Yes, that is what I mean. I think that if Polo or Lacoste want me to advertise their shirts, they should pay me to do so instead of me paying them. As for monograms, I can remember who I am, so I don't need them.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Difference between stylish and effete?