STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Voting for MTO01 and MTO02 is closed. Here are the results:
Voting for MTO01 and MTO02 is closed. Here are the results: Whiskey Indy Commando: 4 Leather: 10 \t Eyelets: 6 Hooks: 5 \t Hand: 5 Machine: 7 Ravello Cap Toe Plain Cap: 12 Quarter-Brogue: 7 \t Hidden Eyelets: 5 Visible Eyelets: 10 I'll update the initial post as well. If you would like to opt out of either of these designs, please let me know ASAP so I can get an accurate final head count. - Keith
Keith, I'm going to opt out of both. Not having speed hooks on the Indy is a dealbreaker for me, I like Indy boots as something I can put on and take off fast when wearing jeans. Also, not having the perforated cap on the ravello boots is a dealbreaker for me as well, I'm just not a fan of how the straight cap looks on Barrie-lasted boots.
As commodorewheeler said, there has been interest in a cigar shell boot. Since MTO01 and MTO02 are on the more formal side of the design continuum (leather soles, full eyelets, no broguing, etc.), maybe we can come up with a more rugged boot design to suit the other half of the masses"”say, something with a commando sole and speed hooks. Again, this can only work if we come to a consensus. Personally, I'll be pretty flexible in terms of my feature preferences. If you're interested in a cigar shell boot, start listing out your design ideas!