$300 Allen Edmonds vs $1000+ Lobb or Edward Green

PhiloVance · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by nelly

I think a true dimepiece female would. Think about it this way: a stylish man may not carry a Berkin bag, wear limited edition Louboutin shoes, or rock a Harry Winston bracelet but we can RECOGNIZE the immense quality/value of the item right? A woman is going to be able to tell a AE from a Lobb simply because she sees the AE about 20 times a day.

I agree with this to a point. I think its going to be tough for anyone to see the difference between multiple pairs of black captoes. However, I think in most cases, people will notice the sleekness of a Lobb on the 7000 versus and AE and make an almost subconscious connection in their mind - that one looks sleeker/nicer/more expensive.

Now, if you put a Lobb captoe in parisian brown museum calf next to an AE in its monotone brown color, I would think this would be "no contest."

patrickBOOTH · May 23, 2011

As a person with a ton of black shoes the difference visually in the leather alone is very different across price spectrums.

makewayhomer · May 23, 2011

This is normally when someone posts the photo essay of the blobby park avenue vs the sleek eg and they look exactly the same

Duder · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by PhiloVance

I agree with this to a point. I think its going to be tough for anyone to see the difference between multiple pairs of black captoes. However, I think in most cases, people will notice the sleekness of a Lobb on the 7000 versus and AE and make an almost subconscious connection in their mind - that one looks sleeker/nicer/more expensive.

Now, if you put a Lobb captoe in parisian brown museum calf next to an AE in its monotone brown color, I would think this would be "no contest."

so does nicer shoes = more sex appeal to the ladies?

just that lately I've been getting more compliments from dudes about the my shoes then the ladies...

or maybe cuz I'm one ugly mofo

nelly · May 23, 2011

Something no one has mentioned yet.

Part of the difference between the AE and Lobb is the rest of the package. A Lobb owner is much more likely to be wearing higher quality shirts, suits, socks... that fit. Meanwhile, a pair of AEs is much more at risk of being paired with a mass produced suit after not being taken care of with shoe trees and polish.

At the end of the day, if you care that much about the price then you probably can't afford it.

PhiloVance · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by Duder

so does nicer shoes = more sex appeal to the ladies?

just that lately I've been getting more compliments from dudes about the my shoes then the ladies...

or maybe cuz I'm one ugly mofo

I have only had men comment on my shoes. Or a few women at work, but never any women in a social setting.

I have had women comment on articles of clothing. I once had a woman ask if everything I was wearing was made of cashmere. I'm not sure why. I think the answer was no but I forget what I told her.

patrickBOOTH · May 23, 2011

Girls tend to comment on things that are more in-your-face. If you have a deep rich brown patina, or burgundy shoes they will like them. In my experience men have always commented on the shine, or condition of my shoes and not the brand or style itself.

delightindisorder · May 23, 2011

According to Stanley's research in Stop Acting Rich (writer of The Millionaire Next Door), Allen Edmonds is the #1 dress shoe brand of millionaires. But what do they effing know? They also shop for pants at Kohl's and suits at Dillard's/Macy's.

gsgleason · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by delightindisorder

According to Stanley's research in Stop Acting Rich (writer of The Millionaire Next Door), Allen Edmonds is the #1 dress shoe brand of millionaires. But what do they effing know? They also shop for pants at Kohl's and suits at Dillard's/Macy's.

I'm wearing brown AE park avenues with some Kohl's Khakis as I read this.

greekgeek · May 23, 2011

E makes some great gunboats, not to mention the finest bicycle toe shoe evA! #4 last FTW

nelly · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by delightindisorder

According to Stanley's research in Stop Acting Rich (writer of The Millionaire Next Door), Allen Edmonds is the #1 dress shoe brand of millionaires. But what do they effing know? They also shop for pants at Kohl's and suits at Dillard's/Macy's.

The average run of the mill millionaire with the majority of their net worth tied up in illiquid assets like their house SHOULD be buying AE's and NOT John Lobbs.

I believe Lobb produces less than 40,000 pairs of shoes per year. There are more than 10million millionaires in the world. Lobb is targeting people worth $30MM+.

greekgeek · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by nelly

The average run of the mill millionaire with the majority of their net worth tied up in illiquid assets like their house SHOULD be buying AE's and NOT John Lobbs.

I believe Lobb produces less than 40,000 pairs of shoes per year. There are more than 10million millionaires in the world. Lobb is targeting people worth $30MM+.

You mean they are not targeting SF member's who are barely scraping by at the poverty level ($250k)?

pebblegrain · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by nelly

Something no one has mentioned yet.

Part of the difference between the AE and Lobb is the rest of the package. A Lobb owner is much more likely to be wearing higher quality shirts, suits, socks... that fit. Meanwhile, a pair of AEs is much more at risk of being paired with a mass produced suit after not being taken care of with shoe trees and polish.

At the end of the day, if you care that much about the price then you probably can't afford it.

thanks for the irrelevant comments

Superfluous · May 23, 2011

Originally Posted by nelly

The average run of the mill millionaire with the majority of their net worth tied up in illiquid assets like their house SHOULD be buying AE's and NOT John Lobbs.

I believe Lobb produces less than 40,000 pairs of shoes per year. There are more than 10million millionaires in the world. Lobb is targeting people worth $30MM+.

That's irrelevant. People don't buy clothes/shoes always based on what they can afford. I know/met several people worth much more than $30 million, and they don't buy shoes anywhere near the price of Lobbs. It really boils down to whether people care/want them or not, not how much they make. Many people who buy those shows are people on SF... I'm guessing most SF members are no where near the range you're talking about.

LanceW · May 23, 2011

I had a late 30s fem compliment my walnut Strands one evening by calling them fancy. With that said, I have given away my AEs due to fit and am down to 1 remaining Alden due to sloppy construction.

$300 Allen Edmonds vs $1000+ Lobb or Edward Green

Distinguished Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Distinguished Member

Active Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Stylish Dinosaur

Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Senior Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Distinguished Member

Senior Member

FEATURED PRODUCTS

Similar threads

Featured Sponsor

Definitely full canvas only

Half canvas is fine

Really don't care

Depends on fabric

Depends on price

Forum Sponsors

Forum statistics

FOLLOW STYLEFORUM ON: